STOCK MARKET BSE NSE

Voters angry, frustrated with corporators, reveals study

Significantly, men at 89 per cent and women at 85 per cent supported the idea of re-elections to have more power over corporators. 

Published: 03rd December 2020 07:37 AM  |   Last Updated: 03rd December 2020 07:37 AM   |  A+A-

election-voting-inked-finger-photo2

(Representational Image | EPS)

Hyderabad voters want more power to control and punish corporators and municipal officials who do not perform. Over 91 per cent respondents in a recent study stated they felt ‘anger and frustration’ about the State’s indifference towards people’s problems. At the same time, they also expressed fear of angering those in power and said it influenced their vote.

The Urban Distress and Reforms Study 2020, a research-based study of voter perception at the municipal level, was conducted in 15 of the total 30 circles of the Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation (GHMC) area from November 1 to 15. 

The findings of the study revealed that 95 per cent respondents supported the Right to Recall of non-performing corporators before the end of their term. Also, 74 per cent wanted a similar power over the careers and tenures of municipal officials. This is significant in view of the GHMC elections in a city recently ravaged by floods.

The study found that over 77 per cent respondents had faced financial loss due to the floods. The highest (83 per cent) was among respondents earning between Rs 20,000 – Rs 30,000 per month, followed by those earning up to Rs 10,000 per month (80 per cent). The hardest-hit were the ST and OBC categories, where over 80 per cent respondents faced losses. 

Urban flooding in Hyderabad had affected over 37,000 families, especially in the low-lying areas of the city. Over 74 per cent of people held the government responsible for the losses, while over 16 per cent felt citizens themselves were responsible. Significantly, 43 per cent said they have no option for recovery of losses, while almost 26 per cent said they would take loans, and 17 per cent said they would sell assets.

Notably, in view of the hardships faced by the city residents, two out of every five people studied stated that affording food had become more difficult. Among these, over 90 per cent respondents stated that their food consumption had reduced as compared to before. An overwhelming 92 per cent people said that their financial troubles had forced them to postpone plans, which would ‘negatively impact their quality of life or aspirations.’

Over 91 per cent felt anger and frustration when corporators did not care about their problems, and of these, higher numbers were among those with lower levels of literacy. The levels of anger were lower among the general castes but was almost even among all income segments.

However, over 74 per cent felt fear of angering those in power – the highest proportion being in ST category respondents at 87 per cent, and among those citizens with schooling of up to 12th class at 82 per cent. Across all categories, 68 per cent respondents said that this fear had an impact on their vote.

The findings also revealed that almost 69 per cent felt corporators performed their duties mainly before elections. About nine out of 10 persons believed that voters have no powers over corporators once they are elected. About 88 per cent respondents were prepared to vote again in a Right to Recall re-election to oust the non-performing corporators and elect a fresh candidate. 

Significantly, men at 89 per cent and women at 85 per cent supported the idea of re-elections to have more power over corporators. 

The highest support for Recall at 91 per cent was among those educated up to primary level schooling, while the highest opposition of only 16.7 per cent was among graduates and above.  Members of SC community were most in support of Recall at 91 per cent and the most opposition was from respondents of the ST community at just over 19 per cent. 

Recall is not a new right at the municipal level, and has been implemented in Madhya Pradesh since 2001 and in Chhattisgarh since 2007. In these States, this reform is an extension of the no-confidence motion, which is put on ballot for the municipal voters to decide.

The study was undertaken by the New Delhi-based research organisation, Institute of Perception Studies, which works in the areas of electoral reforms and democratic deficit, with special focus on municipal and panchayat levels.  

(The author is a researcher at the Institute of Perception Studies, New Delhi)



Comments

Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp