Mutant legacy of a British-era law in Manipur

Independent India has followed the British land revenue administration model in Manipur and this has led to friction among the ethnic communities in the region.

Published: 22nd June 2022 12:41 AM  |   Last Updated: 22nd June 2022 12:41 AM   |  A+A-

Manipur British law

Image used for representational purpose only (Express illustration by Soumyadip Sinha)

Following the invasion and occupation of Assam and Manipur by the seventh ruler of the Konbaung dynasty, King Bagyidaw of Burma in the early 19th century, the British felt their province of Bengal was made vulnerable and intervened.

They annexed Assam and merged it with Bengal after defeating the Burmese in the First Anglo-Burmese War and signing the Treaty of Yandaboo in 1826. The British also helped two Manipur princes and their armies in exile in Cachar liberate Manipur but let it remain a protectorate. Good as the British were in sizing up their adversaries, after this war they were confident that Burma was in no position to pose any threat to them thereafter.

They did, however, fight two more wars with Burma in 1852 and 1885, but as  Southeast Asia scholar, Alastair Lamb, puts it in Asian Frontiers: Studies in a Continuing Problem, these were no more than excuses to annex territories and the British "swallowed Burma in three gulps".

This being their security assessment, not long after this war, the British withdrew their regular troops, and in their place raised civil militias, Cachar Levy and Jorhat Militia in the 1830s. The latter merged with the former the same year and came to be known by various names, including Assam Military Police.

How this militia, "less paid than the military but better armed than the police", grew in stature and importance to be finally upgraded to be India’s first paramilitary force, Assam Rifles, in recognition of its contribution to the British war effort during WWI, is well documented by colonial military historian, L W Shakespeare.

Meanwhile, another security concern grew - that of raids by hill tribes on the more plentiful plains during lean seasons. The Ahom had dealt with this through a practice known as posa whereby the hill tribes were given a share of the plain’s produce in kind each year on the promise they would not raid to deserve retributive counter-raids.

The British borrowed this and also introduced the Bengal Eastern Frontier Regulation of 1873, by which an "Inner Line" was drawn to separate the revenue plains of Assam from the "wild" hills that were to be left alone and unadministered. The hills beyond the "Inner Line" came to be later designated as "excluded areas" and "partially excluded" areas.

Ironically, this line, which was drawn originally to secure the revenue plains from the raids from the hills, is now seen as a protection provided for vulnerable small hill populations by the British, and indeed with a measure of truth in the changed social circumstance of post-colonial India.

There were other complications resulting from the Inner Line. One of these was that although the name itself implied an Outer Line as well, it was never drawn. The story of the McMahon Line - which is part of this implied Outer Line - drawn in a hurry during the 1913–1914 Simla Conference when the Inner Line came to be too often and dangerously mistaken for the international boundary, is illustrative of this.
The legacy of this colonial frontier management lives on in the Northeast, but nowhere has it taken a more mutant form than in Manipur.

After the First Anglo-Burmese war, Manipur was left as a protectorate state considering its strategic location. Indeed, Lord Curzon, who explains his notion of the three-layered buffer of British colonial frontiers in his Romanes Lecture 1907, had also visited Manipur in 1901.

From 1826 to 1891, Manipur remained a close ally of the British, participating in several of the latter's expeditions in controlling their eastern frontier, including an expedition to Kendat in Burma during the Third Anglo-Burmese war in 1885, to rescue European employees of the Bombay Burma Company based there.

In 1891, however, when a palace revolt over the crown broke out between sibling princes, the British made an unwarranted intervention leading to an open war in which Manipur was defeated. The British deposed and banished rebellious King Kulachandra and either executed or banished his blood brothers.

Because the British did not immediately think of a successor to the throne, by the Doctrine of Lapse introduced by Lord Dalhousie in 1859, Manipur came to be automatically annexed by the British and this lasted from April 27 to September 22, 1891.

But after finally agreeing to putting a scion from a different royal bloodline on the throne, they allowed Manipur to become a protectorate again. Their choice, Churachand, was only a five-year-old and so, till he came of age and while he was being educated at Mayo College in Ajmer, the British political agent acted as regent.

In 1907, Churachand was coronated but it was the British who determined the broad architecture of the princely state’s administrative structure. A Manipur State Darbar was formed, and the President of this Darbar was the British political agent, taking somewhat the role of the Governor in the British-ruled province of Assam.

The administrative mechanism of separating the hills and plains, tried and tested in Assam, was also introduced, whereby only the plains were to be administered and not the hills, which remained "excluded areas" (though without actually drawing an Inner Line as in the case of Assam). They also left a corridor between the hills and plains known as "Sadar Hills", which was to be neither a hill nor valley - somewhat the equivalent of a “partially excluded” area.

Independent India has allowed a mutant version of this system to remain in Manipur, in matters of land revenue administration. The state follows two laws - one for the hills and the other for the Imphal valley, causing complications and dangerous frictions between its ethnic communities.

The Imphal valley follows a modern land revenue law and its benefits are open to all domiciles, but the law for the hills is exclusionary, especially to the valley-dwellers - the Meiteis. Even Sadar Hills, now Kangpokpi district, which was originally meant to be neither hill nor valley, is now considered a hill district, though there are still elements of hybridity of the two land laws.

For instance, Nepalis can own land, vote and even contest elections here, but not the Meiteis. Consequently, a hostile mental distancing is now crystallising. In Manipur’s ethnic cauldron, this can lead to tragic outcomes.

It is time for change. Manipur needs to come under one modern land revenue administration, though with reasonable variations introduced for different topographies, cultures, economic practices of communities, etc.

(The writer is editor of Imphal Review of Arts and Politics and he can be contacted via mail at


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp