Modi cries. India too can only cry

His was a dignified crying that could be managed with a quick flashing of the thumb under the eyeglass and a sip of water.

Published: 14th February 2021 06:28 AM  |   Last Updated: 14th February 2021 09:51 AM   |  A+A-

Prime Minister Narendra Modi

Prime Minister Narendra Modi (Photo| ANI)

Our Prime Minister cried in Parliament the other day. No, his face didn't go into contortions of grief and the body did not shake with sobbing. His was a dignified crying that could be managed with a quick flashing of the thumb under the eyeglass and a sip of water. The sight of a democratically elected leader succumbing to emotions of the ordinary kind must have attracted widespread sympathy from those who watched the scene on TV.

What made him cry? People must have thought that he was grieving over the death of more than 200 farmers who died in the course of their Long March protest. Or, they thought he was upset that responsible citizens like Sudha Bharadwaj and Stan Swamy were still in prison for no offence other than expressing opinions different from the Government's. But we learned in due course that our Prime Minister turned teary-eyed not for reasons lay citizens thought possible.

He cried because Ghulam Nabi Azad was retiring from Parliament. This made no sense. Retiring from Parliament is a routine. And Azad is not even a BJP man. Why should the country's most important BJP leader cry when a Congressman leaves the Rajya Sabha?

Obviously, it is theatrics. But who is it meant to fool? Azad must have been pleased, of course. He made the kind of statement politicians do. "We understand some people superficially and some in depth. Those who understand me in depth and saw my work over the years became emotional yesterday. I am thankful to everyone," he said.

So, Modiji understood Azadji in depth and all is well with the world. Shashi Tharoor had the best comment on Modi's emotional farewell. "Artfully crafted performance," he said. He recalled farmers' leader Rakesh Tikait breaking down recently and said: "It was partly in response to Tikait’s tears that the PM decided he also has tears."

Political leaders crying in the open always attract headlines. That, too, must have weighed with Modi, a master in the art of public relations. He would have known how tears have influenced history. Winston Churchill famously cried in Parliament, not once but many times until Edward VIII called him a "cry baby".

Jawaharlal Nehru turned teary-eyed while listening to Lata Mangeshkar’s rendering of 'Aye mere Watan Ke Logon' on Republic Day in 1963. Donald Trump represented the other side of the spectrum; he said crying by men was a sign of weakness.

Remember he made his millions in real estate business, a cut-throat field. Modi is known for his love of theatrics. Punjab CM Amarinder Singh called him "a self-obsessed man interested only in publicity; all his actions are aimed at that". But even his bitterest critic must agree that he is a master of the art of publicity.

He knows how to seize the moment and leave his imprint on it. The absence of an effective opposition in India is no doubt the main reason for the BJP's success. The Congress is in no position to challenge the BJP because the Congress has become a mere extension of Rahul Gandhi, who turns into a national leader only when he is in the right mood.

Where is BJP with its cadre base and where is Congress with its time servers? Rahul Gandhi is either unable or unwilling to see the negative impact of his on-again, off-again kind of leadership. He doesn't lose, but his party does.

The call for internal elections has been strong in the Congress lately. Officially, they have also fixed a time frame for such an election. But no one seems to have been impressed. If Rahul Gandhi is a candidate for the president's post, will there be another candidate? How credible will be the election even if a 'naam-ke-wastay' candidate is put up against him? The reality is that inner-party democracy is not only nonexistent in the Congress; it is not possible because of the Gandhi family's overwhelming status in the party.

The political scenario in India is not going to change in the foreseeable future. It will be a two-party system, with one party strong in its internal structure as well as leadership, and the other party losing its identity into the identity of a single family. The BJP is lucky. The Congress is unlucky. India? Well, India is unlucky. It can only cry.


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

  • s.m.

    From my point of view the PM's tears might have been for [1] to solicit Azad to join BJP as he has been distancing from the Gandhis lately [2] to show that he is still human despite being the PM of India [3] may be a flash thought hit him
    1 year ago reply
  • a.k.sehanobis

    1 year ago reply
  • A C Govindan

    Congress Party has fooled INDIANS for 6 decades. The KING is now walking naked! Only 23 felt ashamed and cried Foul
    1 year ago reply
    • Abilash

      What is it that they fooled Indians about?. I keep hearing this line a lot. If you can take the time to educate me as to what they fooled the Indian people about I would be very happy.
      1 year ago reply
  • Jay S

    Please save your cries. Modi is going to win for at least next term
    1 year ago reply
flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp