STOCK MARKET BSE NSE

No need for outrage over SC’s Ayodhya decision

In the age of instant news, nothing is beyond the pale of instant judgement either.

Published: 30th October 2018 04:00 AM  |   Last Updated: 30th October 2018 02:14 AM   |  A+A-

In the age of instant news, nothing is beyond the pale of instant judgement either. Even a routine development in a case—the Supreme Court decision to defer the Ayodhya case hearing to the first week of January, for instance. The apex court has taken this time to reconstitute the bench, now comprising Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi and Justices S K Kaul and K M Joseph. Two senior judges who have heard the case earlier, Justices Ashok Bhushan and Abdul Nazeer, could either be added or replace some of the judges or a wholly new bench could be constituted. It’s only in the fitness of things that judges who have a fine-grained familiarity with the minutiae of the case are brought back and the incumbent CJI too familiarises himself with the voluminous depositions and papers of the case.

Anyone could have seen this as the most logical course of action, if only emotions and tempers or the tendency to issue political barbs could be kept under check. Not every decision of the court can or should be seen as some of kind of T20 match won or lost—certainly not procedural ones. It’s worse if cases are seen in the context of whether a political dispensation has won or lost a brownie point. It should have been obvious to critics from the decisions on the CBI fracas that no such consideration enters the court’s mind.

The CJI, who has been focusing on cutting down pendency of cases, was categorical that the court’s priority right now would not be served by plunging headlong into hearing this time-consuming case on a day-to-day basis. The civil suit arises out of the Allahabad High Court judgment by which the disputed land was divided into three parts. The scheduling of its hearing, or any deferment, would be up to the reconstituted bench. Given the fact that a new Lok Sabha will have to be in place by May, election heat would begin to peak by March. How the Ayodhya title suit plays out during those days would depend on the political parties.

More from Editorials.

Comments

Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

IPL_2020
flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp