Needless legislations to cast shadow on interfaith unions  

The law will also provide for all interfaith marriages to be necessarily intimated to the district authorities a month in advance.

Published: 24th November 2020 07:53 AM  |   Last Updated: 24th November 2020 07:53 AM   |  A+A-

Shikha, 22, a resident of Jagatpuri, got engaged to Kunal from Noida eight months earlier and was all set to tie the knot on November 25. But the marriage was called off by the groom's family as her family was only able to offer Rs 2.5 lakh as dowry.

Representational Image. (File Photo)

By next month, Madhya Pradesh could become the first state to bring in a law against what is called love jihad. Any marriage deemed to have been carried out through force or solemnised for religious conversion will become an offence, inviting a jail term of up to five years. The law will also provide for all interfaith marriages to be necessarily intimated to the district authorities a month in advance. MP will not be the only state to bring in such a law; the BJP-ruled states of Karnataka, UP and Haryana plan to do an encore.

For right-wing outfits, it is a validation of their decade-long campaign that Hindu girls are being trapped by Muslim boys on the pretext of marriage and being converted to Islam. But most of these allegations, if not all, have been found to be dodgy. The impetus for the new law came after a girl was killed by her lover in UP in what was labelled by her family as love jihad. And UP Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath went into needless hyperbole, threatening in colourful language to bump off such offenders.

While the National Crime Records Bureau has no documented case of love jihad, the head of the National Commission for Women, Rekha Sharma, was exercised enough to raise the matter when she called on the Maharashtra Governor a few weeks ago. But given the lack of empirical evidence, the laws being contemplated by the states are bound to instil fear of harassment among interfaith couples. And the clause on advance notice of a month is bound to raise consternation. How can the state sit in judgement on who will be life partners?

The new law smacks of over-legislation at a time when the country is just about slipping into the second wave of the novel coronavirus.  Unsurprisingly, it is being seen as divisive, regressive and undemocratic. It is also bound to draw negative global attention—like the CAA—from leaders such as US President-elect Joe Biden. India has been a melting pot of, among other things, interfaith union and harmony, of which BJP leader Shahnawaz Hussain himself is an example. Let not anything be done to disturb the fine balance.


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

  • a.k.sehanobis

    This is the correct decision.The Hindu girls are under a severe misconception about carnal pleasure
    2 years ago reply
flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp