STOCK MARKET BSE NSE

China's curious admission of Galwan casualties

There is no clarity yet on why China decided to de-escalate now despite agreeing to do so as far back as in September last.

Published: 22nd February 2021 07:39 AM  |   Last Updated: 22nd February 2021 07:39 AM   |  A+A-

This satellite photo provided by Planet Labs shows the Galwan Valley area in the Ladakh region near the Line of Actual Control between India and China Tuesday, June 16, 2020

This satellite photo provided by Planet Labs shows the Galwan Valley area in the Ladakh region near the Line of Actual Control between India and China. (File Photo | AP)

China’s late acknowledgement of casualties at the June 15 Galwan Valley brawl along the Line of Actual Control in Ladakh, which left 20 Indian soldiers dead, appeared intriguing. It came a day before the next round of military-level talks on disengagement elsewhere, including at Galwan, after a full pullback of armoured vehicles and the infantry of China and India from both the north and south banks of the Pangong lake.

That total orderly withdrawal was achieved in less than 10 days was as mystifying as the first pullback announcement itself, since India has learnt to sift between China’s statements and its actual intent. There is no clarity yet on why China decided to de-escalate now despite agreeing to do so as far back as in September last. A lot of back-channel diplomacy ought to have happened to get the LAC disengagement back on track.

The biggest takeaway so far is the creation of buffer zones in both north and south Pangong areas with no patrolling in the demilitarised areas till some kind of solution is found. Creating a safe distance between the two armies and a no-patrol zone at each of the other friction points like Hot Springs, Gogra and Depsang ought to be the template that is replicated without conceding territory, as was done at Pangong. Such pacts are the product of hard-nosed negotiations and require time, patience and a cool head.

China perhaps sought to put the Indian negotiating team off-balance by accepting four deaths at Galwan, honouring them, putting out a spliced video of the day’s violence to spin its narrative of Indian soldiers being the aggressors and dissing our noisy media as also the political and military leaderships. But if the nation believes the world will lump it, it’s surely living in a fool’s paradise.

No amount of whitewashing can take the taint out of the barbaric PLA attack at Galwan with medieval arms. That it flouted a 45-year-old norm of not opening fire on the LAC can also not be erased from history. Instead of mindless theatrics, it ought to proactively untangle the mess. As for India, what could it offer if China were to fully disengage? That would depend on how well de-escalation is achieved on the ground.



Comments

Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp