Angmo said the grounds of detention used against Wangchuk "are stale" and some of them "rely on videos that are one and a half years old or one year old".
Appearing for Angmo, senior advocate Kapil Sibal submitted that additional grounds have been included in the amended petition challenging the validity of the detention order.
The senior law officer representing the Centre said that there is no problem with notes being shared with the petitioner, but noted that delay in providing the grounds of detention should not become a ...
Dr Angmo, filed the writ petition on October 2nd in the top court under Article 32 of the Indian Constitution and claimed that the arrest of her husband, Wangchuk, was illegal.
