STOCK MARKET BSE NSE

Spinners help India peg back Australia

From a point of promise, if not dominance, after Warner and Cowan added 139 runs, Australia stuttered to a tricky 273 for 7 at stumps on the second day of the third Test.

Published: 16th March 2013 10:06 AM  |   Last Updated: 16th March 2013 10:06 AM   |  A+A-

IND-VS-AUS-4-TESTS

Ironically on a day the Australian batsmen demonstrated unprecedented intensity, the most bizarre shot came from the least probable candidate, Michael Clarke, whose momentary indiscretion swung the match momentarily in India’s favour, after openers Ed Cowan and David Warner had, for the first time in the series, laid a substantial foundation.

From a point of promise, if not dominance, after Warner and Cowan added 139 runs, Australia stuttered to a tricky 273 for 7 at stumps on the second day of the third Test, and for every fallen wicket, the absurdity of Clarke’s mode of dismissal only amplified.

The first ball upon his arrival, Clarke stepped out of his crease to Ravindra Jadeja, his usual four-step tip-tap to the spinners, so far so prolific, but the ball pitched a few inches lesser than he had anticipated, and it fizzed across him for Dhoni to affect a routine stumping.

Though Clarke might have realised he wasn’t up to the pitch of the ball — and hence attempted to check than go through with his shot — Jadeja’s faster pace meant he had little time to make the adequate adjustment  to  get back to the crease and save his wicket. Whatever be it, his mode of dismissal was unwarranted, though Jadeja too merits credit for his length.

Two wickets in two balls — Warner was dismissed the ball before — the resistance of Cowan and Warner seemed wasted, and a familiar implosion loomed large. The struggling Phil Hughes departed soon after, as Australia lost three wickets for 12 runs. Though Cowan and Steven Smith, went about resurrecting, Cowan’s  dismissal diminished Australia’s aspirations.

Although Cowan’s 238-ball 86 exemplified the virtues of grit and graft, he was the beneficiary of India’s sloppy fielding, as he was reprieved thrice (on 39, 64 and 85) — twice by Virat Kohli at first slip and once by Cheteshwar Pujara at silly point. His 139-run-alliance with a restrained David Warner (71 off 147 balls) was the crux of their attempt to put up a big first-innings total.

They grinded an Indian attack bereft of imagination and discipline, best portrayed by Ishant Sharma’s waywardness, though he partially redeemed himself  with the scalps of Brad Haddin and Moises Henriques with prodigious reverse swing after tea (a probing spell of 4-1-7-2).

Ravichandran Ashwin was spasmodically effective while Pragyan Ojha, who replaced Harbhajan Singh, was rusty and prone to straying down the leg side.

Ravindra Jadeja was India’s punt-horse. Unlike Ashwin and Ojha, Jadeja, on the contrary, is flatter through the air and gives more zip and action on the ball. So if it turns and bounces when a batsman has to play forward, there is hardly any time to adjust.

Contrastingly, Ojha and Ashwin are slower, loopy bowlers — an action which can, and does, get wickets but it also gives a batsman more time to stay back, watch the ball spin and adjust his stroke.

Except the openers and Smith, the lone surviving specialist batsman, unbeaten on 58, none paid heed to the time-tested cricketing tenets.



Comments

Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

IPL_2020
flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp