After Rahane's Ton, Onus on Spinners to Take India Home

The hosts will have to hunt down a monstrous target of 413 in a maximum of 117 overs.
We just have to focus in the present. We have to apply our minds and if we do that I am sure we will do well tomorrow, Rahane said. AP
We just have to focus in the present. We have to apply our minds and if we do that I am sure we will do well tomorrow, Rahane said. AP

COLOMBO: No team has chased more than 352 to win a Test at the P Sara Oval. The punters wouldn’t bet ag­­­­ainst that in this Test eith­­er. The hosts will have to hu­­n­t down a monstrous target of 413 in a maximum of 117 ov­­ers. For that they have to ki­­­­­ck along at a rate of 3.5. Wi­­nning the Test, and if so the se­­ries, seems beyond their gr­­­­asp.

Batting time, though, isn’t impossible, history points out that the last drawn Test ca­­me here 10 matches ago, ba­­­­ck in 2003, where fourth-innings batting wasn’t even required. The 9 matches si­­nce have produced results, and overall there has been on­­­­ly four draws in 16 matches. An ominous precedent for Sri Lanka, though the strip has not yet deteriorated into a tantrum-throwing beast. Apart from stray instances of invariable bounce, the surfa­­ce hasn’t made the spinners li­­ck their lips in gl­­ee.

In that context, it can be argued that India perhaps delayed their declaration, nine overs after the tea. The lower order tried to run helter-skelter for quick runs, but it was clear that they had pre-decided on a definite number of overs in which they could fold out Sri Lanka, even if showers were to disrupt the final day (then showers have only flattered to deceive). Their confidence might have also been furthered by the fa­­ct that hosts don’t possess men who are capable of entrenching themselves and saving a Test, barring a certain Kumar Sangakkara.  Taking all these factors into consideration, Indian batsmen didn’t over-exert themselves, apart from the forenoon session when the ball was relatively new and they were necessitated to impose themselves on Sri Lankan bowlers. Hence, Murali Vijay (82) and Ajinkya Rahane (126), briskly began to accumulate runs.

It began with Rahane lat­­c­­hing onto anything that was pi­­tched marginally short or f­­­­u­­­­ll. He whipped Rangana He­­­rath through midwicket before lofting him over cover. He brought up his half century with a reverse sweep off Tharindu Kaushal.

Vijay consumed more time to get his bearings. But the in­­troduction of Dushmantha Chameera gave him a chace to increase the ante. He pu­l­l­­e­­d him over mid-wic­­k­­et for a six. In the next over, he he­­a­­­ved Kaushal over midwicke­t. Thus in the first hour, In­­d­­ia added 68 runs in 13.4 ov­­­­ers, Vijay scoring 40 in 38 ba­­lls and adding 28 in 44 balls.

Post break, they were slightly pegged back by Kau­­shal, who accounted for Vijay, after his 140-run partner­­ship with Rahane, and Virat Kohli. Consequently, they e­ked out only 41 runs in 13 ov­­ers in the next hour.

More ag­­gression was expected after lunch, but Rahane and Ro­­hit Sharma batted like the­­y normally would in five-day cricket, which when you look back, was justifiable, for a heap of wickets would have restored Sri Lanka’s chances of flitting through the tail. But as the partnership progressed, they began to open up, their 85-run alliance co­­m­ing at a healthy rate of 3.86. Overall, 255 runs in 61.4 ov­e­rs at a rate of 4.1 wa­­sn’t flaccid, as far as blaring intention was concerned.

An anti-climax looks improbable, now that Sri Lanka have lost the one man they believed could orchestrate the impossible, Sangakkara.

Related Stories

No stories found.

X
The New Indian Express
www.newindianexpress.com