BCCI annual contracts for women: Where Ranji reserves earn more than domestic cricketers

While there are a few mitigating factors — lack of sponsors in women’s cricket being a primary concern and the women have a very short season as compared to the men
Indian captain Mithali Raj (File | AP)
Indian captain Mithali Raj (File | AP)

CHENNAI: Thursday is International Women’s Day. The theme for this year is #PressForProgress — a push for gender parity worldwide.Just as well that the BCCI announced a new contract system for India’s women cricketers on Wednesday.  This is only the second time that the board has announced a central contract system for women cr­icketers, and first after the 2015-16 season.

After becoming the last cri­cket board to hand out central contracts for women, they made further progress on Wednesday. 19 players were included under three categories (only 11 featured across two categories in 2015-16).But this news comes with a heavy caveat: the BCCI could be doing a lot more to pay its women cricketers better. Nothing illustrates this point better than Jayant Yadav’s new contract. Yadav has not played for the Indian te­am since the Test in Pune against Au­stralia la­­st February. That translates to not being ca­p­ped by the national te­am over the last 376 d­a­ys. All-rounder Harmanpreet Kaur, in that sa­me time, has fe­­atured in 17 ODIs and five T20Is. Mithali Raj, who skippered the team in their run to the World Cup final last year, has similar numbers since Yadav’s last appearance for the men’s national team. You will never guess who gets paid more by the BCCI.

As per the new contract system, Yadav, who is in Category C, will be paid a retainership of Rs 1 cr for the period of Oct 2017 to Sep 2018. We are into the sixth month of the said period and Yadav has played for India zero times during that time. Zero. Kaur and Raj, two of the four women cricketers to be featured in Grade A, will be paid a retainership of Rs 50 lakh for the same time period. They both played for India 22 times. Twenty-two times. The new pay structure also gives the impression that women’s domestic players are being inadvertently punished because of them not being involved in any four/five-day games. Consider this fact: men’s senior domestic reserves will be paid more (Rs 17,500) than each and every playing member of the various domestic women’s teams (Rs 12,500).

While there are a few mitigating factors — lack of sponsors in women’s cricket being a primary concern and the women have a very short season as compared to the men and don’t have the same patronage — the previous point is an indictment of sorts. Sure, there has been a big bump in contracts of the A-listers. The likes of Raj and Kaur have been given a raise of Rs 35 lakhs (from Rs 15 lakh, a jump of over 200%). But in the year when women’s cricketers forced themselves on the public’s consciousness — reaching the World Cup final and beating South Africa in their own backyard — it could have been a touch better.

Grade A
Rs 50 Lakh
Mithali Raj
Jhulan Goswami
Harmanpreet Kaur
Smriti Mandhana

Grade B
Rs 30 Lakh
Poonam Yadav
Veda Krishnamurthy
Rajeshwari Gayakwad
Ekta Bisht
Shikha Pandey
Deepti Sharma

Grade C
Rs 10 Lakh
Mansi Joshi
Anuja Patil
Mona Meshram
Nuzhat Parveen
Sushma Verma
Punam Raut
Jemimah Rodrigues
Pooja Vastrakar
Taniya Bhatia

swaroop@newindianexpress.com

Related Stories

No stories found.
The New Indian Express
www.newindianexpress.com