‘Reduction of Sreesanth ban justified’: Justice Mukul Mudgal

BCCI ombudsman’s decision to reduce the length of S Sreesanth’s ban may come as a fresh ray of hope for Ankeet Chavan.

Published: 22nd August 2019 08:13 AM  |   Last Updated: 22nd August 2019 08:13 AM   |  A+A-

Justice Mukul Mudgal

Justice Mukul Mudgal (Photo | EPS)

Express News Service

KOLKATA: BCCI ombudsman’s decision to reduce the length of S Sreesanth’s ban may come as a fresh ray of hope for Ankeet Chavan. The Mumbai spinner was banned for life with the speedster in August, 2013, for involvement in spot-fixing during the IPL that year.

According to Justice (retd) Mukul Mudgal, who probed irregularities in IPL as the head of a panel constituted by Supreme Court, Chavan will have a strong case if he appeals against the verdict. He also welcomes the decision to reduce the ban on Sreesanth, saying that the seven-year suspension he would end up serving was good enough.

“I’m not sure if Chavan has approached the court, but he can go to the ethics commission. Going by the parity of reasoning, he too should be treated similarly. He was handed the penalty for the same offence and in similar circumstances,” Justice Mudgal told this newspaper on Wednesday.

Before the BCCI ombudsman brought down Sreesanth’s ban, the bowler had won a court verdict which lifted his life ban and left it to the board to decide the quantum. There is no news of Chavan moving court. The left-arm spinner is 34 years old.

Justice Mudgal felt life ban was too harsh. “There is no doubt what Sreesanth did was not acceptable and the act deserved to be penalised. But there are three reasons why I support the reduction of the ban. By bowling no-balls, he didn’t affect the outcome of the match. Spot-fixing in not same as match-fixing. Finally, it was a match between two private entities in a private event. There were no nations involved. Seven years is fair enough.”

Sreesanth was accused of bowling no-balls deliberately and letting a towel hang out of his trousers to signal when he did it. The charge against Chavan was he conceded a certain number of runs in an over. Both played for Rajasthan Royals and were suspended by a BCCI disciplinary committee consisting of N Srinivasan and Niranjan Shah. They were arrested and spent time behind the bars.

Ajit Chandila, a third player from Rajasthan Royals, was also banned for life for the same offence in the same edition of the IPL. But his ban was announced later, in January, 2016. There is no news of him appealing against the decision either.

Stay up to date on all the latest Cricket news with The New Indian Express App. Download now


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp