'If land has not been alienated, how can it be reclaimed?'

Published: 24th September 2012 12:09 PM  |   Last Updated: 24th September 2012 12:09 PM   |  A+A-


Taking a cue from his cabinet colleagues —P Sabita Indra Reddy, J Geetha Reddy, Kanna Lakshminarayana and Ponnala Lakshmaiah _ roads & buildings minister Dharmana Prasada Rao wants a probe by the state government into the decisions taken by the then YS Rajasekhara Reddy’s cabinet to ascertain whether the ministers had violated any business rules while issuing the 26 controversial GOs or not.

Prasada Rao, who has been leading a life of recluse ever since the CBI charge-sheeted him in Jagan’s assets case, talked with mediapersons at his residence here on Sunday. He raised several issues relating to the CBI case against him and wanted the state government to examine them thoroughly. The following are some of his observations:

CBI’s limits

Can the CBI question the decisions taken by a cabinet or not is a debatable subject. The Supreme Court has given several verdicts over this issue.

Cabinet decisions

As per the business rules of the state government, neither the revenue minister nor the chief minister has got the authority to allot a single acre of land to any person or institution, even in the interest of the state, without the nod of the cabinet. Whatever decisions I had taken as revenue minister during the regime of  YS Rajasekhara Reddy were taken with the approval of the then cabinet. Thus I had neither violated any business rule nor allotted a single acre of land to anybody illegally.

Minister a public servant

The CBI has levelled charges against me and asked for government’s nod to prosecute me under Sec 197 of CrPC and Sec 19 of PC Act. As every minister is also a public servant, the CBI sought the sanction of the government to prosecute me.

I have given my reply in detail to the government to each charge. But it is the responsibility of the government to examine whether the CBI has looked into all aspects of the business rules of the government or not in levelling charges  against me.

I will come clean

I did not commit any mistake in issuing GOs. I am fully confident that I can prove my innocence in the court and come out clean.

Charges unfounded

I feel that the charges levelled against me by the CBI are unfounded. For instance, the CBI, in its fourth chargesheet, accused me of alienating a land to a particular company and further charged me with not reclaiming the land from that company. As the land was not alienated, how can I reclaim it?

I am only accused

I am only an accused not convict. All the charges levelled against me are to be proved in a court of law. Even before the court prosecutes us, opposition parties are branding us as criminals and culprits. Is it justified?

Stay up to date on all the latest Andhra Pradesh news with The New Indian Express App. Download now


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp