STOCK MARKET BSE NSE

CBI Special Court dismisses Andhra MP Raghurama Raju’s petition against CM Jagan

Andhra MP Raghurama Krishnam Raju had filed two petitions, one against the Chief Minister and the other against MP Vijayasai Reddy seeking cancellation of bail granted to them.

Published: 16th September 2021 07:32 AM  |   Last Updated: 16th September 2021 07:33 AM   |  A+A-

YSRC rebel MP K Raghurama Krishnam Raju

YSRC rebel MP K Raghurama Krishnam Raju (Photo | Facebook)

By Express News Service

HYDERABAD: The CBI Special Court, on Wednesday, September 15, 2021, dismissed AP MP Raghurama Krishnam Raju’s two separate petitions seeking revocation of bail for AP Chief Minister Y S Jagan Mohan Reddy and MP V Vijayasai Reddy. 

Raju said in the petition that the CBI had registered 11 chargesheets in the case of disproportionate assets against Jagan. He alleged that Jagan as Chief Minister was influencing the witnesses in the case. Raju hadd filed the first petition for cancellation of bail of the AP CM in the first week of April, 2021. Later he filed another petition seeking cancellation of bail granted to Vijayasai Reddy in the same case.

‘Jagan influencing witnesses in the case’

The MP had filed two separate petitions, one against Jagan Mohan Reddy and the other against Vijayasai Reddy seeking cancellation of bail granted to them in Jagan assets cases. During the course of hearing in the Special CBI Court recently, Vijayasai Reddy filed an application seeking permission to visit foreign countries, for which the lower court granted permission for two weeks. Suspecting the motive of the lower court orders in favour of Vijaysai Reddy, Raju filed a petition to transfer the bail cancellation petitions from CBI Court to any other court. 

The High Court of Telangana,  dismissed the petition filed by Raghurama Krishnam Raju, seeking transfer of his case from the CBI Court to any other court. The petition was heard by Justice K Lakshman at length on Tuesday and the order was reserved. While dismissing the transfer petition, court found fault  with the petitioner’s attitude for attributing malafide intentions to the lower court.



Comments

Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp