STOCK MARKET BSE NSE

Human Rights Forum writes to Andhra Pradesh government over custodial death probe

All magisterial inquiries conducted after the June 2006 amendment came into force have not been adhering to the letter and spirit of the CrPC 176 (1A).

Published: 12th May 2022 04:59 AM  |   Last Updated: 12th May 2022 04:59 AM   |  A+A-

A report on custodial deaths in Tamil Nadu.

Image used for representational purpose only.

By Express News Service

VISAKHAPATNAM: The Human Rights Forum (HRF) has urged the Andhra Pradesh Chief Secretary to intervene and ensure that Section 176 (1A) is followed and all custodial deaths are inquired into by a judicial magistrate or metropolitan magistrate and not an executive magistrate as is the practice now. 

In a letter to the Chief Secretary on Wednesday, HRF leaders K Sudha, UG Srinivasulu and VS Krishna said an RDO was not empowered to conduct an inquiry and such a probe has no legal sanctity. The HRF has brought this to the notice of both Vizianagaram and Eluru collectors but to no avail.

All magisterial inquiries conducted after the June 2006 amendment came into force have not been adhering to the letter and spirit of the CrPC 176 (1A). In most, if not all cases, RDOs are holding the inquiries even though it is expressly impermissible in law, they said.

In the most recent death of Madipalli Apparao (36), a farm hand of Pothunuru in Denduluru mandal in the custody of  Bhimadole police in Eluru district on May 4, and that of a self-employed electrician Betha Rambabu (42), who died on February 11 on the precincts of Nellimarla police station in Vizianagaram district, the RDOs have conducted the inquiries though they are not empowered to do so as per law.

They said the insertion of Section 176 (1A) through an amendment to the CrPC in 2005 mandates that all custodial deaths should be inquired into by a judicial magistrate or metropolitan magistrate rather than an executive magistrate.

This provision was inserted by the Criminal Law Amendment Act (Act 25 of 2005) and has come into force on 23-06-2006. The objective of the amendment is to insulate the administration of criminal justice from institutional bias and to ensure that justice is done, they said.



Comments

Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp