Siddaramaiah, 8 others get notices over law practice licences

The notice was issued in response to the criminal petition filed by the Anti Corruption Council of India Trust.

Published: 23rd June 2016 05:30 AM  |   Last Updated: 23rd June 2016 05:31 AM   |  A+A-

BENGALURU: The High Court on Wednesday issued a notice to nine advocates who turned peoples’ representatives, including Chief Minister Siddaramaiah and Union Law Minister Sadananda Gowda, for continuing to draw salary or remuneration without surrendering their ‘sanad’ (licence) of practice to the Karnataka State Bar Council.

Justice H Billappa also issued a notice to ministers T B Jayachandra, R V Deshpande, H K Patil, former chief minister M Veerappa Moily, Lok Sabha member Mallikarjun Kharge, V S Ugrappa, MLC and former Law minister Suresh Kumar.

The notice was issued in response to the criminal petition filed by the Anti Corruption Council of India Trust, Chairman Hussain Mueen Farooq and its member Rudrappa. They challenged the January 8, 2016, order of the Lokayukta Special Court which dismissed the private complaint lodged by the petitioners.

The petitioners contended that the Lokayukta Special Court had observed that the respondents received salaries and perks illegally but did not apply its judicial mind and dismissed the complaint.

The complainants said the accused had violated Rule 49 of the Bar Council of India Rules under the Advocates’ Act, 1961. They submitted that the accused have been illegally drawing salaries and availing other perks for the last 30 years.

All the accused, who are advocates enrolled with the Karnataka State Bar Council and elected as representatives or nominated to Parliament or the Karnataka Legislative Assembly or Council are violating the rules.

The petitioners requested the court to take cognizance of the offences and to prosecute and punish the accused for having committed the offence punishable under the provisions of IPC and Prevention of Corruption Act.

“An advocate shall not be a full-time salaried employee of any person, government, firm, corporation or concern, so long as he continues to practise, and shall, on taking up any such employment, intimate the fact to the Bar Council on whose roll his name appears and shall thereupon cease to practise as an advocate so long as he continues in such employment,” the complainants quoted the rules as saying.

The petitioners claimed that all the respondents are advocates practicing at various places and they have violated Section 14 of the Karnataka Ministers Salaries and Allowances Act, 1956, by engaging themselves on a full time salaries employment of the government enjoying all remuneration without surrendering their ‘sannad’ which was mandatory and not optional.


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp