STOCK MARKET BSE NSE

Lingayat faction backs M B Patil, says he didn’t twist seer’s words

Lingayat faction has said they stand by the statement of M B Patil, who claimed that the Siddaganga mutt supported their stand that Lingayats and Veerashaivas are not the same.

Published: 15th September 2017 03:42 AM  |   Last Updated: 15th September 2017 10:29 AM   |  A+A-

Lingayat leaders addressing a joint press conference on separate religion status in Bengaluru on Thursday. Minister Vinay Kulkarni, MLA BR Patil, MLC Basavaraj Horatti and retired IAS officer Jamdar are seen | Nagaraja Gadekal

By Express News Service

BENGALURU: In the continuing series of dispute over the status of Lingayats and Veerashaivas, the Lingayat faction has said they stand by the statement of Water Resources Minister M B Patil, who claimed that the Siddaganga mutt supported their stand that Lingayats and Veerashaivas are not the same.

At a press conference on Thursday held by Minister Vinay Kulkarni, JD(S) MLC Basavaraj Horatti, Aland MLA B R Patil and retired IAS officer S M Jamdar, the group made it clear that Patil had not twisted what was discussed at the meeting between him and Siddaganga mutt seer Shivakumar swami.
MLC Basavaraj Horatti said the seer should not be drawn into the controversy. The team, however, insisted on saying that Patil had not lied, but when asked if that meant that the seer had lied, they refused to give an answer.

At this stage, Aland MLA B R Patil pipped in and said the stand of the mutt came about due to a conspiracy hatched by Sangh Parivar. “Sangh Parivar leaders from Delhi have pressurised them. The ones who sent Yeddyurappa to jail are the ones who have hatched this conspiracy. That is why the seer changed his stand,” he alleged.

Kulkarni said it was an attempt to damage their fight. “The timing of Somanna’s visit to the mutt and Yeddyurappa’s statement saying we should wait for two days to see what happens is noteworthy. No political leader should misuse the mutt. This is not right,” he said.The group also tried to buttress their argument by referring to an audio tape supposedly by one Shivakumar, an administrator at Siddaganga mutt, where he expressed the view that Lingayat and Veerashaiva were not the same. However, when reporters pointed out that the Mutt had issued a statement saying that their administrator was a man named Vishwanath and the voice in the audio tape belonged to a Group D employee from SIT college named Shivakumar, the group had no answer.



Comments

Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

IPL_2020
flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp