STOCK MARKET BSE NSE

‘KRIDC can’t entrust inquiry to Lokayukta: HC

The High Court has held that the Karnataka Rural Infrastructure Development Corporation (KRIDC) does not have the power to entrust inquiry against its officials to the Lokayukta.

Published: 15th January 2021 04:50 AM  |   Last Updated: 15th January 2021 04:50 AM   |  A+A-

Karnataka HC

Karnataka High Court (Photo | EPS)

By Express News Service

BENGALURU: The High Court has held that the Karnataka Rural Infrastructure Development Corporation (KRIDC) does not have the power to entrust inquiry against its officials to the Lokayukta. Allowing a petition questioning the entrusting of inquiry to the Lokayukta, Justice M Nagaprasanna held that entrusting an inquiry into the hands of the anti - corruption watchdog by the managing director of the corporation is an act without jurisdiction, and is not available with the corporation.

The petition was filed by KRIDC executive engineers GB Devaraj, Davanagere; BP Lingaraju, Shivamogga; and Assistant Executive Engineer Ashwathanarayana Swamy, Ballari, who questioned KRIDC’s order dated October 29, 2018, entrusting the departmental inquiry against them into the hands of the Lokayukta, and consequent action of the Additional Registrar of Enquiries-13, Lokayukta, issuing articles of charges dated December 20, 2018, pursuant to the entrustment.

The corporation entrusted the probe to the Lokayukta on a complaint of misconduct over a building construction, following a reference made by the government after receiving a report from the Lokayukta, under Section 12(3) of the Karnataka Lokayukta Act. On arguments of the Lokayukta’s counsel that it was created to root out graft and the court’s interference will dilute its object, the judge stated that the object with which the Lokayukta is created will have to be executed only in accordance with the law.

“There is no specific rule in the corporation for such entrustment, as the Karnataka Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules are not specifically adopted by the Board of the Corporation, and the finding is rendered only in the absence of such adoption...” the judge said. Justice Prasanna quashed the entrustment of enquiry to the Lokayukta and charges against the petitioners. However, he made it clear that setting aside the order will not preclude the corporation to proceed against the petitioners under the Cadre and Recruitment Rules of the corporation.



Comments

Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp