STOCK MARKET BSE NSE

State Govt Opposes Ombudsmen's Plea

Published: 21st August 2014 06:00 AM  |   Last Updated: 21st August 2014 03:05 AM   |  A+A-

KOCHI: The state government on Wednesday submitted before the Kerala High Court that the extension of tenure of the Ombudsmen for the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGS) cannot be claimed as a matter of right and the prerogative lies with the government.

hc.jpgThe state filed the counter-affidavit in response to a batch of petitions filed by K Chenthamarakshan, former ombudsman for MGNREGS, Ernakulam district, and ombudsmen for Palakkad, Wayanad, Kozhikode and Pathanamthitta districts challenging the government order not to extend their tenure. 

Senior government pleader Viju Abraham submitted that the government was not inclined to extending the tenure of Ombudsmen beyond 65 years of age and the term of the other incumbents expires after two years from the date of joining duty. The tenure of appointment will be two years or up to the attainment of 65 years of age, if the state government so desires the tenure can be extended to one year. The petitioners have crossed the age of 65. The extension of tenure is optional and not mandatory on the part of the government as the petitioners were appointed by the state government, the affidavit stated.

The institution of Ombudsman was only a supplementary arrangement under the scheme to address the need for grievance redressal in addition to that of the district programme coordinators. It was evidenced by the fact that grievance redressal was entrusted with the district programme coordinator and not the Ombudsman under the Act of 2005. The institution of Ombudsman was only a supplementary arrangement to strengthen the grievance redressal under the scheme. The offices of ombudsmen are not part of the 2005 Act. “The action of the government, in placing District Collector in charge of the Office of the Ombudsman, in the interim period is not open to challenge.  Needless to say, on the appointment of a new batch of Ombudsmen, the District Collectors will be relieved of their additional charge of the office of the Ombudsmen,” it submitted.

Bringing the office of the Ombudsmen under the control of the District Collector as an interim arrangement will not defeat any purpose of the Act or the scheme.

The District Collector is also the District Magistrate and holds an office of high integrity.

For relieving Ombudsmen on completion of appointed tenure, recommendation of the Selection Committee is not warranted, the state submitted.

Stay up to date on all the latest Kerala news with The New Indian Express App. Download now

Comments

Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp