STOCK MARKET BSE NSE

Non-payment of mobile bills not cheating: Kerala High Court

The legal proposition does not match the materials on record as well as the allegation made out through the FIR.

Published: 13th March 2019 02:10 AM  |   Last Updated: 13th March 2019 02:10 AM   |  A+A-

court, order, hammer, high court

For representational purposes

By Express News Service

KOCHI:  Bringing a relief to mobile phone customers who are dragged into criminal cases by operators, the Kerala High Court observed that non-payment of mobile bills cannot be considered cheating. It is merely a case of breach of trust or agreement and does not fall under the purview of a criminal offence, the court said. Justice T V Anil Kumar issued the order while allowing the petition filed by P V Abdul Hakkem of Vyttila in Ernakulam seeking to quash an FIR registered by Ernakulam Town South Police station.

According to the prosecution, the petitioner, after having obtained a mobile postpaid connection in his name, failed to pay the bills for a period of five months from July 21, 2006 to November 21, 2006. The mobile company alleged the petitioner incurred a gross monetary liability of Rs 97,678 for the period and after making part payment of Rs 10,580, he kept the balance in arrears. The prosecution said the default amounted to cheating, punishable under Section 420 of IPC.

The petitioner submitted that the transaction was based on an agreement between the parties and therefore the alleged liability under the transaction was pure of civil nature. Bharati Airtel Ltd, the complainant in the case, did not appear despite serving notice on it.

The court observed this was a civil dispute. The purported liability of the petitioner seems to have arisen from breach of promise or agreement other than a breach followed by any dishonest intention to cheat the complainant. “Mere breach of trust or agreement will not by itself amount to a criminal offence under Section 420 of IPC.

In order to make out an offence under Section 420, the prosecution has to show that the dishonest intention to cheat existed at the time when the alleged promise in question was made,” held the court. The legal proposition does not match the materials on record as well as the allegation made out through the FIR. The court held the case was one of civil dispute between parties, hence it quashed the entire proceeding against the petitioner.

Stay up to date on all the latest Kerala news with The New Indian Express App. Download now

Comments

Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp