KOCHI: Highlighting the shortcomings in the electoral law, the Kerala High Court has directed the Election Commission to insist that a candidate contesting an election as part of a coalition submit a declaration from an authorised representative of the grouping along with the nomination papers. Justice A Muhamed Mustaque issued the order on Tuesday while allowing a petition filed by K Sivadasan, who was a councillor in Koduvally Municipality in Kozhikode challenging his disqualification.
Sivadasan had filed his nomination papers as a Congress candidate from a ward in the 2015 local body elections, but another person also filed his nomination with the support of the District Congress Committee, which declared that the latter was its official candidate.
However, the other constituents of Congress-led UDF supported Sivadasan as an independent candidate. In the election, Sivadasan won and the LDF candidate approached the Election Commission seeking to disqualify him. This was allowed by the commission.
The court noted that there was no provision prescribed by the Election Commission or under the statute to record the arrangements made among political parties or independents for the purpose of contesting an election under the umbrella of a coalition.
The court observed that the anti-defection law is in the nature of a punishment, depriving one’s status as an elected member and debarring him/her from contesting future elections. But, one cannot be punished on account of lack of clarity and shortcomings in the law.
Sivadasan, immediately after he got elected, declared himself that he was a part of the UDF and elected as an independent member. He could have declared this before the election had the law provided for recording the allegiance to the coalition.
Evidence shows that the votes canvassed by him was as a UDF candidate. All other local constituents of the coalition supported him. The anti-defection law is not intended to punish someone who has shown allegiance to a particular coalition; it is intended only to bridle persons who have a tendency to jump sides. Sivadasan cannot, therefore, be faulted for the ambiguity and lack of clarity that exist in the law.
The coalition itself is an association of a collective mind of different political entities. The law, unfortunately, has not made a provision to record the views of the collective body prior to the election, observed the court.
Santhosh Mathew, High Court lawyer, said, “Consequent to this judgment, a declaration will have to be given by an authorised representative of the coalition that a particular person is supported by the coalition. This will bring in clarity regarding the candidature and will ensure that voters are also able to make an informed decision. With this order, horse trading will be prevented to a large extent.”