STOCK MARKET BSE NSE

Conduct of criminal/POCSO cases: Kerala HC asks principal district judges to send report on appointment of public prosecutors

A Division Bench while dealing with an appeal filed by a convict in the POCSO case was appalled by the abject incompetence displayed by the prosecution.

Published: 02nd December 2021 05:10 PM  |   Last Updated: 02nd December 2021 05:10 PM   |  A+A-

Kerala High Court

Kerala High Court. (Photo| A Sanesh,EPS)

By Express News Service

KOCHI: The Kerala High Court has directed all the Principal District Judges to send a report regarding the appointment of public prosecutors for the conduct of criminal and Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) cases in various courts in the districts.

An order issued by PM Suneera, Deputy Registrar stated that the District judges should file a report forthwith, regarding "the consultation made within the selection of public prosecutors and also the practices followed in the appointment of public prosecutors and special prosecutors for the conduct of criminal and POCSO cases."

The order was issued based on a suo motu case about the appointment of public prosecutors. 

A Division Bench comprising Justice K Vinod Chandran and Justice Ziyad Rahman AA while dealing with an appeal filed by a convict in the POCSO case was appalled by the abject incompetence displayed by the prosecution.

The Bench had also directed the registry of the court to initiate suo motu case in the matter of appointment of public prosecutors.

The court observed that though the appointment of the public prosecutors is the prerogative of the government, there is no absolute freedom in so far as the same should be in consultation with the sessions judge as required under the provisions of the CrPC.

In practice, when an application for the appointment of prosecutors is called, the session judges prune it on the basis of the competence as displayed in the courts, invariably the district magistrates seek the entire applications to be sent to them for preparation of panel, who often does not have a clue as to the competence of a particular advocate. They cannot cherry-pick the advocates to be appointed as prosecutors based on political affiliations as the CrPC requires a consultation with the Session Judge, the court observed.



Comments

Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp