STOCK MARKET BSE NSE

Ignorant of Kerala HC acquittal, government refuses to free woman given life imprisonment!

The Kerala government recently dismissed a request to repeal the life imprisonment of a 37-year-old Angamaly native woman convicted in a 2016 case of killing her eight-year-old son. 

Published: 17th May 2022 03:55 PM  |   Last Updated: 17th May 2022 04:12 PM   |  A+A-

Kerala High Court

Kerala High Court (File Photo| A Sanesh, EPS)

Express News Service

KOCHI:  If anyone still doubts the speed at which papers move in government offices, here’s another classic example. The Kerala government recently dismissed a request to repeal the life imprisonment of a 37-year-old Angamaly woman convicted in a 2016 case of killing her eight-year-old son. 

But there's a twist: A division bench of the Kerala High Court had acquitted Teena Baiju of the charges in February. Simply put, the government is unaware of this even two months after the court order.

It was on February 16 this year that a division bench comprising Justice K Vinod Chandran and Justice C Jayachandran acquitted Teena on her appeal petition.

On April 29, however, the Kerala Government Order (GO) issued by the home department stated that the request for remission of the sentence as per Section 131 of Kerala Criminal Rules of Practice by Teena has been rejected. She had been sentenced to life imprisonment by the Ernakulam Additional District and Sessions Court on November 20, 2020, after convicting her of murder and attempt to commit suicide.

The incident related to the case happened on April 30, 2016. Following a domestic discord with her husband, Teena administered five sleeping pills to her son. Later, she cut the vein on her right wrist and consumed a pesticide to die by suicide. During trial, the court observed that Teena’s husband used to torture her after consuming alcohol.

When Teena filed an appeal against the Additional Sessions Court verdict at the High Court, she also sought a provision for remission of the sentence. Based on it, the government sought reports from the authorities concerned including the district probation officer, Ernakulam. 

ALSO READ | Denial of justice would lead to anarchy: CJI Ramana in Srinagar

Granting remission will send wrong message: SP

The probation officer, in his letter to the home department on November 29, 2021, favoured her release claiming Teena’s husband Baiju is willing to accept her back. However, the Ernakulam Rural SP, in his report dated December 3, 2021, said granting remission to Teena will send out a wrong message to society.

The Director-General of Prisons and Correctional Services reported on December 8, 2021, that Teena completed nine months and 17 days in Viyyur Central Prison and that her conduct and character had been good. But despite the reports, the government decided to issue the GO rejecting remission of her sentence.

Though reports in this regard were given to the home department by December 2021, no decision was taken. In between, the court considered Teena’s appeal and acquitted her after finding flaws in the trial court’s proceedings on February 16.

"Maybe the government was not aware that Teena was already acquitted by the High Court. When the appeal was under consideration, the matter of remission was taken up by the government. The current order dismissing the remission request will have no impact as she has been acquitted," said advocate P K Varghese who appeared for Teena at the High Court.



Comments

Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp