STOCK MARKET BSE NSE

Private buses benefited by students' scheme: CAG

The CAG has blamed the UT government for failing to collect `24.15 lakh under the students special bus scheme implemented by the government.

Published: 31st July 2013 10:15 AM  |   Last Updated: 31st July 2013 10:15 AM   |  A+A-

The CAG has blamed the UT government for failing to collect `24.15 lakh under the students special bus scheme implemented by the government.

The scheme provides transport facilities at concessional rate(`1) to the students of government and aided schools in Puducherry and Karaikal regions by engaging private bus operators through Puducherry Road Transport Corporation (PRTC). The operators were paid fixed amount per month for allotted routes on the basis of distance covered per day.

The CAG report pointed out that the scheme was operated for the past three years without any formal tripartite agreement between the  Directorate of School Education (DSE), PRTC and private bus operators.

As against deducting the rate of ` 1,000 as expenditure towards per day diesel cost per bus, the deduction of only ` 7,000 was made from the monthly bills relating to summer vacation period, as demanded by the bus operators, instead of `22,000 (22 working days) required to be made. This resulted in unintended benefit of ` 24.15 lakh to private  bus operators.

Consequent to the accident that occurred  on October 31, 2011 to a special bus,  which claimed the life of one student and injured 62 others, the directorate instructed the operators to restrict the load and not allow more than 80 students to travel at a time.

However, the CAG stated that operators did not follow the norms and established it through a photo in which students were hanging out both from the doors as well from a railing behind the bus.

Further, no information was available with the PRTC or DSE on how many students actually used the transport service, though the DSE deducted ` 100 per day as charges for 50 students towards to and fro trip from the monthly bill of the bus operator; it did not have mechanism to assess the number of students covered under the scheme.

The report stated that theschool buses were not operated in conformity with the directions of Supreme Court. Firefighting equipment and first aid box were not found in the buses and students were allowed to board the bus in excess of the permitted capacity.



Comments

Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

IPL_2020
flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp