Notice to EC on plea seeking to derecognise PMK

Party functioning against the aim of the Representation of the People Act: Petitioner

Published: 08th June 2013 08:46 AM  |   Last Updated: 08th June 2013 08:46 AM   |  A+A-

The Madras High Court on Friday ordered notice on a public interest writ petition for a direction to the Election Commission of India to de-recognise the Pattali Makkal Katchi.

The first bench of Acting Chief Justice RK Agrawal and Justice M Sathyanarayanan ordered the notice, returnable in two weeks, while taking on file a public interest writ petition from R Varaaki of Tambaram East.

The petitioner contended that the Pattali Makkal Katchi, founded by Dr S Ramadass, was functioning against the aim of Section 29-A (5) of the Representation of the People Act.

Varaaki had earlier filed petitions to stop granting of permission to the Vanniyar Sangam to celebrate the ‘Chithirai Thiruvizha’ at Mahabalipuram on April 25.

However, the Kancheepuram district superintendent of police granted permission for the festival, subject to certain conditions. The participants in the said ‘Vizha’ had unleashed violence.

Three buses were torched in Marakkanam. Police personnel were injured, public properties were damaged and the conditions stipulated were violated.

Ramadass and his son Anbumani violated the Constitution and pushed the Vanniyar community into the ‘stone era,’ the petitioner alleged.

Meanwhile, Justice KK Sasidharan dismissed a writ petition from V Vadivel, Adyar Circle Secretary of the Pattali Makkal Katchi, praying for a direction to the Sastri Nagar police to grant permission to conduct the party’s propaganda public meeting at Adyar on June 8.

The judge observed that the police had refused permission on the ground of law and order.

The rejection order, if considered in the light of the recent incidents in Villupuram district and Marakkanam in particular and other places, was correct.

It could not be said that the police had no materials to reject the permission on the ground of a possible law and order problem in the area. “Therefore, I do not find any merit in the writ petition,’’ the judge said and dismissed it.


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp