STOCK MARKET BSE NSE

15 Yrs Late With Reply, Civic Body Blasted by HC

Published: 13th September 2014 06:03 AM  |   Last Updated: 13th September 2014 06:03 AM   |  A+A-

CHENNAI: The Chennai Corporation was lambasted by Madras High Court for keeping mum for nearly 15 years and suddenly waking up from its deep slumber when a contempt application was filed for not taking appropriate action.

While passing orders way back in February 1999 on a writ petition praying for a direction to regularise a building, the court had directed the ‘Appellate Authority’ to take a decision on the application for regularisation. After waiting 14 long years, the petitioner had filed the present contempt petition in 2013.

When the matter came up before the First Bench of Chief Justice SK Kaul and Justice M Sathyanarayanan on September 10, counsel for the Corporation submitted that there was no such ‘Appellate Authority’ to carry out the Court’s order.

Irked by this, the bench retorted that if there was no such authority, it was the bounden duty of the Corporation to have obtained a clarification in 1999 itself when the order was passed. “This is no excuse for circumventing the order merely because the description of the authority may not have been correctly recorded in the order,” the bench added.

“Even on a query, the Corporation counsel is unable to state as to whether any regularisation application was filed by the petitioner and the fate thereof. The phraseology used is that there is no application ‘pending’. It appears that deliberately a nebulous stand has been taken so that the correct picture does not appear before the court as to what is the decision on the regularisation application, if at all taken,” the bench pointed out.

It also observed that it was not able to know whether vague notices were being sent deliberately to finish off the formality, rather than officers inspecting and thereafter, issuing notices for any unauthorised construction, when it was told by the petitioner that she had received a vague notice containing only the information furnished in the contempt application, recently.

The bench directed the Corporation to communicate the decision taken on the regularisation application within a week or to ask for a fresh one and give a reply within two weeks thereafter. “The Corporation Commissioner and junior executive engineer shall be responsible to ensure compliance.”

Stay up to date on all the latest Tamil Nadu news with The New Indian Express App. Download now
(Get the news that matters from New Indian Express on WhatsApp. Click this link and hit 'Click to Subscribe'. Follow the instructions after that.)

Comments

Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp