Government was Violating SC Order on Jallikattu: Animal Board

MoEF was in violation of the Supreme Court judgment while issuing an order allowing the bull taming sport Jallikattu during Pongal.

Published: 07th April 2016 11:07 PM  |   Last Updated: 07th April 2016 11:07 PM   |  A+A-


NEW DELHI: The Ministry of Environment and Forests (MoEF) was in violation of the Supreme Court judgment while issuing an order allowing the bull taming sport Jallikattu during Pongal in January this year and it was constrained to approach the apex court against ministry’s move, the Animal Welfare Board of India (AWBI) said in its reply to the show cause notice by the ministry.

The reply by AWBI Chairman Maj Gen (retd) R M Kharb submitted April 6, a copy of which is with the Express, says that he has written to the ministry on December 31, 2015, cautioning it against issuing a notification allowing the use of bulls in Jallikattu.

“We were constrained to take this step because despite the Supreme Court judgment, the ministry has not sought our opinion in the matter. However, we received no reply to our commitment, and our reply was disregarded,” said the two-page letter.

The notice issued March 28, said that the AWBI has no locus standi to file any matter before any court without seeking prior permission from this ministry.

Kharb further said that the Supreme Court while holding Jallikattu and other similar events illegal, unconstitutional, and inherent cruel, had held that the Central Government, having accepted AWBI advice in this case, cannot take a contrary stand with consulting the AWBI with regard to July 11, 2011 which bans use of bulls, bullocks as performing animals.

On the ministry’s stand that the role of AWBI is advisory and the Board has been directed to get approval of the Ministry before filing counter-affidavits, Kharb said: “The AWBI is a statutory body and we derive our mandate from the statute from the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960.”

“The statute also unambiguously envisages the Board as being a body corporate distinct from the Government, with the power and the right to sue and be sued in its own name. The functions and duties, and the obligations imposed upon us by the Act and by various judgments of the Supreme Court and High Court, is what we have to perform and adhere to,” he said.

As the ministry to withdraw the show cause notice, the reply says that having been constituted to uphold the provisions of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960, we have to do so in letter and spirit.

“It is not our intention to routinely oppose the Government, and it is quite incorrect that we have been filing writ petitions in various courts seeking directions/relief against the Government of India. Even in the A. Nagaraja matter (the case that brought ban on jallikattu), we had filed an appeal before the Supreme Court, which we had to do in order to protect the rights and safeguard the interests of animals,” he further added.

Stay up to date on all the latest Tamil Nadu news with The New Indian Express App. Download now
(Get the news that matters from New Indian Express on WhatsApp. Click this link and hit 'Click to Subscribe'. Follow the instructions after that.)


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp