Two Acts nail the culprits

For two of the eight convicts in the case who were awarded double death sentences, one was served under the provisions of SC Act.

Published: 13th December 2017 02:34 AM  |   Last Updated: 13th December 2017 08:09 AM   |  A+A-

Gowsalya making a statement after the judgment on Tuesday | Express

Express News Service

TIRUPUR: The Scheduled Castes and Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, is an Act of the Parliament enacted to prevent atrocities against the downtrodden segments of our society. The Act, known better as POA or the SC/ST Act, underwent a landmark alteration to emerge as The Scheduled Castes and Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities)Amendment Act, 2015 - a watershed moment in the protection rights of the Dalits.

The purpose of the original Act was to help social inclusion of Dalits into the Indian mainstream. Time and again the Supreme Court has reiterated the significance and importance of the Act. The architect of these two legislations was P S Krishnan, the then special commissioner for SC and STs. He retired as a secretary to the Government of India.

The importance of the Act could be gauged by what the apex court had to say about the legislation: “The offences of atrocities are committed to humiliate and subjugate the SCs and STs with a view to keep them in a state of servitude. Hence, they constitute a separate class of offences and cannot be compared with offences under the Indian Penal Code.” So why amend such a historic Act? The amendment in 2015 was aimed at including provisions missed during the enactment of the original Act.

In his thirty 30 years of service as an IAS officer, Krishnan vigorously worked for the advancement and empowerment of the Scheduled Castes (SC), Scheduled Tribes (ST) and Backward Classes (BC). One of the most significant of his pioneering initiatives at the national level was the formulation and initializing of the Special Component Plan for Scheduled Castes in 1978 and later the SC and ST Act (1989) and the SC and ST Amendment act (2015).

As far as the landmark judgment in Udumalai Shankar murder case is concerned, these two Acts were instrumental in getting the accused the sentences they deserved. The legislation served as a touchstone for assessing the moral fabric of our society and where we stood. In delivering a judgment granting death to six of the eight convicts, the additional noose was served under provisions of this Act.

Krishnan shared his views with Express. “The SC and ST Act, 1989, acted as a democratic weapon to serve justice to the Dalits. This Act was used in many cases where Dalits and the downtrodden were victims. It also talks about special courts to try such cases and special prosecutors. In 2015, we worked on the Amendment Act and included provisions which were lacking in the original Act and The Scheduled Castes and Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities)Amendment Act, 2015, was passed.”

How the murder case played out

Jul 11, 2015: Caste Hindu Girl Gowsalya of Palani marries Shankar, a Dalit youth from Udumalpet
Mar 13, 2016: Gowsalya and Shankar attacked by a gang, Shankar killed and Gowsalya admitted to a hospital
Jun 16, 2016: Gowsalya’s father Chinnasamy, her mother Annalakshmi, maternal uncle Pandithurai and eight others arrested for the murder
Nine accused, including Gowsalya’s parents, slapped with Goonda’s Act
Aug 19, 2016: The then Tirupur cCollector Jayanthi appears as a witness and gives
her statement
Nov 17, 2016: The trial ends and judge postpones verdict
Dec 12, 2017: Judge Alamelu Natarajan delivers a landmark verdict

For: A strong deterrent

Anti-caste campaigners hailed the verdict of death penalty saying it would act as a deterrent and send a strong message to casteist forces. “Though I am against death penalty, I do not want to boast as human rights activist by commenting against death sentence,” Srinivasan, an activist, wrote on the social media. Ravi Kumar, a campaigner against capital punishment said, “Justice triumphed.”

Against: It’s institutional murder

Convicts require severe and rigorous punishment. But, is death penalty right? In a way it is an institutional murder. Lifelong RI is severe than death sentence. Because, death is a gift, not punishment, says Kumaragurunathan Pratheeepan on Facebook. Sai Lakshmikanth says, “That is not even the solution. What would make the murders to feel remorse is that rest of their lifetime in jail should be made as the  alms from Gowsalya.”

Stay up to date on all the latest Tamil Nadu news with The New Indian Express App. Download now
(Get the news that matters from New Indian Express on WhatsApp. Click this link and hit 'Click to Subscribe'. Follow the instructions after that.)


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp