STOCK MARKET BSE NSE

Contractor moves court over Rs10 crore bribe demand

Alleging that Higher Education Minister K P Anbalagan demanded more than 10 crore as bribe for award of a contract for construction of buildings for polytechnic colleges in eight districts.

Published: 28th July 2017 01:18 AM  |   Last Updated: 28th July 2017 07:33 AM   |  A+A-

By Express News Service

CHENNAI: Alleging that Higher Education Minister K P Anbalagan demanded more than `10 crore as bribe for award of a contract for construction of buildings for polytechnic colleges in eight districts in the State, a Class-I contractor has moved the Madras High Court with a writ petition for a direction to the PWD Chief Engineer to open his financial bid in front of him and to award the contract without consulting the minister.

When the petition from V Vengan of Pavakkal in Krishnagiri came up before Justice M Duraiswamy on Thursday, Additional Advocate-General S T S Moorthy took notice. The judge posted the matter after three weeks.

The petitioner said the PWD issued a tender notification on May 8 last for the construction of additional buildings under Phase-II for new government polytechnic colleges in Madurai, Theni, Pudukkottai, Villupuram, Vellore, Krishnagiri, Tiruchy and Erode districts. The tenders were to be opened at 3.30 pm on June 9, in the presence of the tenderers or their agents.

However, the tenders were not opened on that day. Only pre-qualification bid was opened on June 22 and the petitioner, who was present on the occasion, was found to be qualified. However, the price bid was not opened.

The petitioner alleged that he was advised by the chief engineer to meet the minister and accordingly, he met him on July 21. To his shock, the minister demanded 20 per cent commission of the contract amount, which would run to `13 crore against the total project cost of `79 crore. Otherwise, the contract would go to another bidder — Nandhini Constructions of Erode, who had agreed to pay 16% commission, the minister allegedly told him.

Petitioner contended that the minister cannot demand a bribe for awarding the contract work to the lowest bidder. He is not bound to pay any commission to the minister. “In the tender notification there is no clause for payment of illegal commission to the minister,” the petitioner said and added that the PWD is bound to follow the procedure laid down under the TN Transparency in Tenders Act.



Comments

Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp