STOCK MARKET BSE NSE

Tamil Nadu: Speaker P Dhanapal defends his action

Justifying the strong action against the 18 rebel MLAs who withdrew support to Chief Minister Palaniswami, Speaker P Dhanapal said in his order that with their letter to the Governor, these members ha

Published: 19th September 2017 02:09 AM  |   Last Updated: 19th September 2017 08:45 AM   |  A+A-

By Express News Service

CHENNAI: Justifying the strong action against the 18 rebel MLAs who withdrew support to Chief Minister Palaniswami, Speaker P Dhanapal said in his order that with their letter to the Governor, these members have voluntarily given up their membership in the party.  Dhanapal also charged them of siding with Leader of Opposition M K Stalin, and noted that they failed to attend the AIADMK general council meeting.  However, he dismissed the charge against S T K Jakkaiyan, one of the MLAs who had offered support to Dhinakaran, but later retracted. Explaining this different treatment, the Speaker said voluntarily given up membership was not synonymous with resignation.

“A person may voluntarily give up his membership of a political party even though he has not tendered his resignation from the membership of that party. Even in the absence of a formal resignation from membership an inference can be drawn from the conduct of a member that he has voluntarily given up his membership of the political party to which he belongs,” Dhanapal added. Rejecting the contention that disqualification under the anti-defection law was not applicable for acts that happen outside the Assembly, Dhanapal added: “Nowhere in the 10th Schedule of the Constitution or the defection rules it has been mentioned that the cause of action for instituting the proceedings before me under Tenth Schedule should have occurred or commenced within the jurisdiction of the Assembly or the House.

The 10th Schedule provides two instances for invoking anti-defection proceedings, he said. “One being after the vote and another being voluntarily giving up the membership, which can happen due to any incident outside the House as well. I hold that the jurisdiction to entertain the petition on the facts and to adjudicate the same. Under the 10th Schedule of the Constitution, it is only the Speaker who has the power and jurisdiction to hear a complaint. In such circumstances, the doctrine of necessity would apply.”
Charging the MLAs of lying, Dhanapal said their interim reply on August 30 said they were out of station from Puducherry. “But in reality, they were present in Puducherry. So, all respondents had made false submissions.”



Comments

Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

IPL_2020
flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp