STOCK MARKET BSE NSE

Medical council to file report on doctor who shared autopsy report on TV

The petitioner submitted that he did not criticise the postmortem certificate issued by the government doctor but only expressed his opinion.

Published: 26th September 2020 02:53 AM  |   Last Updated: 26th September 2020 02:53 AM   |  A+A-

MBBS exam

For representational purpose

By Express News Service

CHENNAI: Refusing to interfere in the one month suspension handed over to a city doctor by Tamil Nadu Medical Council (TNMC) for sharing the postmortem report in a TV debate, the Madras High Court on Friday ordered notice to the council to file a detailed report on the issue. Justice V Parthiban ordered that the petitioner Dr V Dekal, has to stay away from his medical practice for a month.

The petitioner submitted that he did not criticise the postmortem certificate issued by the government doctor but only expressed his opinion. He added, when so many qualified forensic experts were available in the nearby Government Chengalpattu Medical College, the postmortem examination should have been conducted there instead of the one at Madurantakam.

Countering his submissions, G Shankaran appearing for the TNMC said, Dekal participated in a TV programme and discussed the suspicious death of a woman near Chennai. He commented that the postmortem certificate issued by the government hospital was substandard, and had a lot of flaws. The issue pertains to Sasikala, a resident of Guduvanchery, working in a textile showroom in the locality.

On June 24, when Sasikala and her disabled father were sleeping outside their house, Purushothaman, their relative raised an alarm claiming that Sasikala had killed herself. However, it was later found that Purushothaman and his brother Devendran committed the murder. The TNMC, in its order stated: “Blatant accusations of defective postmortem based on the examination report can instigate unwarranted pressure on the part of the affected family and all those involved.

When the police investigations are on and the case is under the purview of our reputed judicial system, Dekal’s act was uncalled for by a registered medical practitioner.” Refusing to accept his explanation, the council passed an order suspending his licence to practise for one month. Recording the submissions made by both counsels, the court refused to interfere in the punishment and directed TNMC to file counter by October 29.



Comments

Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

IPL_2020
flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp