Madras HC refuses to stay urban civic body polls in Tamil Nadu, adjourns petitions to Monday

The petitions sought deferring polls due to the surging covid positive cases in the state.

Published: 21st January 2022 01:09 PM  |   Last Updated: 21st January 2022 01:09 PM   |  A+A-

Madras High Court.

Madras High Court.

By Express News Service

CHENNAI: The Madras High Court on Friday refused to grant an interim stay on the elections to the urban civic body polls in Tamil Nadu and deferred hearing on public interest litigation (PIL) petitions to Monday for physical hearing as an exception.

The PILs, including the one filed by retired joint director of Health Department Dr M Nakkeeran , came up for hearing before the first bench of Acting Chief Justice (ACJ) Munishwar Nath Bhandari and Justice PD Audikesavalu.

Representing Nakkeeran, senior counsel S Prabakaran said given the alarming Covid pandemic situation unfolding now the elections can be postponed and nothing is going to be lost if the polls are delayed since the civic bodies had been headless for several years.

He charged the Tamil Nadu State Election Commission (TNSEC) of not taking stock of the ground situation on the surging Covid virus infection before preparing for the polls.

The TNSEC had not even reviewed the number of containment zones in the places where the polls are proposed to be held, Prabakaran flayed.

He further said safety of the life of the citizens is involved in the matter and pitched for delaying the polls by two months so that the situation would ease.

Senior Counsel ARL Sundaresan said when the Supreme Court set the deadline for holding the polls the situation was not similar to the prevailing one.

 In the interest of public health, the polls should be delayed, he stressed.

The counsel for TNSEC Siva Shanmugam submitted the poll notification ought to be issued by January 27 as per the orders of the Supreme Court.

He explained that a circular on covid protocol was issued by the poll body and all the standard operating procedures followed during the rural local body polls will be followed.

After hearing the arguments, the bench adjourned the hearing to January 24. It did not grant any interim orders to restrain the issuance of notification or the polls as sought by the petitioners.

The bench allowed the counsels of the petitioners to submit their arguments by physically present at the court as an exception since there were some technical problems troubling audio during the virtual hearing on Friday.

However, the bench said hybrid mode of hearing would also go on simultaneously and the lawyers can prefer the mode as per their choice.


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp