Udhayanidhi's Sanatana remark is not hate speech, says retired HC judge

The retired judge also expressed hope that the Supreme Court would dismiss the petitions filed against Udhayanidhi without entertaining them.

Published: 01st October 2023 07:38 AM  |   Last Updated: 01st October 2023 07:38 AM   |  A+A-

DMK Youth Wing chief Udhayanidhi Stalin

Minister of Youth Welfare and Sports Development Udhayanidhi Stalin. (File photo)

By Express News Service

MADURAI: Commenting on the ongoing legal row over minister Udhayanidhi Stalin's remarks on Sanatana Dharma, retired high court judge Justice Hari Paranthaman said the minister's comment can in no way be equated to hate speech and that the issue is being politicised in view of the upcoming elections.

Speaking at a press conference organised by a group of advocates in support of the minister on Saturday evening, the retired judge also expressed hope that the Supreme Court would dismiss the petitions filed against Udhayanidhi without entertaining them.

Many leaders in TN's history have spoken against the caste system and varnashrama, he pointed out. He also quoted Ambedkar and said, "Ambedkar's criticism of Sanatana and caste system was much stronger but no case was registered against him. Many leaders have made similar statements. Since Udhayanidhi is the chief minister's son, the issue is being politicised."

Moreover, Udhayanidhi had only called for eradication of the caste system and caste-based discrimination. Caste atrocity incidents like Nanguneri and Vengaivayal are proof of the need to abolish the caste system and untouchability, he added. "BJP leaders are spreading false propaganda as if he called for a genocide of Hindus or followers of Sanatana. We strongly condemn such false propaganda," Paranthaman said.

When people have the right to speak in support of Sanatana Dharma, don't those opposing the doctrine not have the same right?, he questioned, adding that the Constitution guarantees freedom of speech to everyone. A comment should be countered by a comment and not by threats or Court cases, he added.

Meanwhile, advocate S Vanchinathan commented on the petitions filed against the minister in Supreme Court and said the content of some of the petitions were laughable and downright incorrect on both legal and factual aspects. "Petitions seeking registration of FIR should first file a complaint with local police or SP or go before the jurisdictional magistrate. They cannot directly approach the Supreme Court," Vanchinathan said. He also remarked that opposing Sanatana is synonymous to promoting 'Samathuvam' or equality and said they (the group of advocates) stand with Udhayanidhi.

Follow The New Indian Express channel on WhatsApp


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

  • Param

    Don't twist it retired judge - that not honourable of you to do. This Minister was not talking against casteism
    1 month ago reply
flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp