STOCK MARKET BSE NSE

HC asks Telangana government to state reasons for not holding LPCET 

The High Court directed Telangana government to file a counter affidavit, explaining why it had not conducted the Language Pandit Common Entrance Test for the last two years.

Published: 11th August 2017 08:06 AM  |   Last Updated: 11th August 2017 08:06 AM   |  A+A-

Andhra Pradesh High Court | Express Photo Service

Andhra Pradesh High Court | Express Photo Service

By Express News Service

HYDERABAD: The High Court on Thursday directed the Telangana government to file a counter affidavit, explaining why it had not conducted the Language Pandit Common Entrance Test (LPCET) for the last two years despite designating a convener for holding the same.Justice Challa Kodanda Ram gave this direction on a petition filed by Balaraj and seven others of the city seeking a direction to the state government to conduct LPCET.Petitioners’ counsel NS Arjun Kumar submitted that a majority of the 42 language pandit training colleges in Telangana were almost shut down with no intake of students due to non-conduct of the entrance test.

Only a few students are pursuing courses under the management quota at some of the colleges. The government’s inaction was detrimental to the interests of poor students who depend on fee reimbursement by the state which would be available only when the admission was by due course under convener quota, he pointed out. The counsel further submitted that last year a single judge had passed an order on a petition filed by a college management, directing the state government to conduct LPCET within six weeks.

Aggrieved by the same, the government filed a review petition which was also dismissed. Despite the court orders, the government was refusing to conduct LPCET, he said. On the other hand, the government counsel told the judge that the government had moved an appeal against that judgment.Justice Kodanda Ram observed that when there was low demand for the said courses, an alternative system of admissions can be thought of. He asked the government pleader and the petitioners’s counsel to come up with actual rule position in this regard. The judge directed the government to file a counter and adjourned the case by one week.

‘Alternative system for admissions’
Justice Kodanda Ram observed that when there was low demand for the said courses, alternative system of admissions can be thought of.

The government’s inaction was detrimental to the interests of poor students who depend on fee reimbursement by the state NS Arjun Kumar, Petitioners’ counsel

Stay up to date on all the latest Telangana news with The New Indian Express App. Download now

Comments

Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp