STOCK MARKET BSE NSE

TSRTC union's strike: Protesting workers say followed rules, KCR government differs

The unions maintain that their strikes were legally tenable, as they gave notice as per Section 22 of Industrial Disputes Act well before 30 days of going on strike.

Published: 08th October 2019 04:21 AM  |   Last Updated: 08th October 2019 09:31 AM   |  A+A-

TSRTC Buses at MGBS BUS Station runed by Private Drivers during the Third day of TSRTC Employees strike. | (Photo | Vinay Madapu/EPS)

TSRTC Buses at MGBS BUS Station runed by Private Drivers during the Third day of TSRTC Employees strike. | (Photo | Vinay Madapu/EPS)

By Express News Service

HYDERABAD: The TSRTC unions’ strike, which has been going on for the past three days, has come under legal scrutiny. The unions, of course, maintain that their strikes were legally tenable, as they gave notice as per Section 22 of Industrial Disputes Act well before 30 days of going on strike.

The government, however, seems to differ on the same.

In a letter dated September 30, the Joint Labour Commissioner of the twin cities, who was appointed as the conciliation official to resolve the dispute, cited two provisions to dismiss this strike as illegal if it were to take place.

ALSO READ | Opposition parties term KCR’s decision of terminating TSRTC workers subversive, vicious, unlawful

One was that a G.O issued by the Department of Transport, Roads and Building — G.O MS No. 09, prohibits strike by any service under the Telangana State Road Transportation Corporation constituted under the Road Transport Corporation Act.

The prohibition was for a period of six months from June 1, 2019. Over and above this, the letter cites that a G.O issued by the LET&F department — G.O Rt No. 408 — declared the Motor Transport Industry in Telangana a public utility service, for a period of six months from June 1, 2019. This further makes the act of strike illegal.

Three days into the indefinite strike by TSRTC employees, commuters wait for alternative transport options at the MGBS bus station in Hyderabad on Monday | Vinay Madapu

However, according to the Industrial Disputes Act, if such a strike has to happen in case of a dispute relating to a public utility service, and a notice has been given under Section 22, the government must start the proceedings.

“For the larger benefit of people, the department can notify some services as public utility services. If that is the case, these services can’t go on strike. As there was a conciliation meeting on October 4, they should not have gone on a strike on October 5,” the conciliation officer told Express.

ALSO READ | TSRTC strike makes Hyderabad air pollution rise as people forced to use personal vehicles

Furthermore, the letter states, Section 22(1) (D) of the LD Act, 1947 reads that during the pendency of any conciliation proceedings before a conciliation officer, and less than seven days after the conclusion of such proceedings, one cannot go on strike.

Stay up to date on all the latest Telangana news with The New Indian Express App. Download now

Comments

Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp