STOCK MARKET BSE NSE

Telngana HC reduces lifer for rape convict to 10 years of RI

In 2014, Ravi, a farmer, proposed to marry the victim, a minor girl eking out her livelihood by doing manual work.

Published: 01st April 2020 10:14 AM  |   Last Updated: 01st April 2020 10:14 AM   |  A+A-

Telangana HC

By Express News Service

HYDERABAD: The Telangana High Court (HC) recently reduced the sentence of a convict from life imprisonment to 10 years rigorous imprisonment, while stating that his offence did not fall in the rarest of the rare cases category. The bench comprising Chief Justice Raghvendra Singh Chauhan and Justice A Abhishek Reddy was hearing the accused Banoth Ravi’s petition.

In 2014, Ravi, a farmer, proposed to marry the victim, a minor girl eking out her livelihood by doing manual work. Though she ignored his advances, he lured her into his relative’s house by stating that he would marry her. There, he raped her several times. On October 18, she escaped from the clutches of the accused and reached home and told to her parents about the incident. During the course of investigation, the accused was arrested and was put up for trial. After appreciating the evidence, the trial court convicted and sentenced him to life imprisonment. Aggrieved with the same, he filed the present appeal before the high court.

The counsel for appellantaccused contended that the prosecution has miserably failed to establish its case for offences under the said sections of IPC and POCSO Act, and therefore, the appellant deserves to be acquitted of the said offences. On the other hand, the public prosecutor contended that as long as the gist of the prosecution is revealed in the complaint, the complainant cannot be faulted.

While upholding the conviction of the appellant-accused, the bench reduced the sentence from life imprisonment to 10 years rigorous imprisonment in the case. The bench made it clear that the appellant who is already in jail, that he should not be granted the benefit of parole by prison authorities or by the court during the remaining part of the sentence.

No parole for the accused

The bench made it clear that the appellant, who is already in jail, should not be granted the benefit of parole by prison authorities or by the court during the remaining part of the sentence.



Comments

Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

IPL_2020
flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp