Doklam hits economic dialogue with dragon

The Doklam military standoff appears to have cast dark clouds over the ambitious India-China strategic economic dialogue.

Published: 19th August 2017 11:43 PM  |   Last Updated: 20th August 2017 08:01 AM   |  A+A-

NEW DELHI: The Doklam military standoff appears to have cast dark clouds over the ambitious India-China strategic economic dialogue. The fifth episode of the talks seems uncertain with both countries digging in their heels on the border issue.

With NITI Aayog vice-chairman Arvind Panagariya making an early exit from the successor to the Planning Commission, the dialogue has also lost one of the strongest voices within the government. Panagariya will leave NITI Aayog on August 31. Another official, Anil Kumar Jain—who was the key coordinator of the dialogue—has also moved out of the think-tank panel.

The fourth annual summit was held in October last year here and China has to host the fifth summit at a mutually convenient date. However, sources in NITI Aayog said the summit is not on their priority. “The next NITI Aayog vice-chairman, Rajiv Kumar, will take over on September 1. He is known to hold views in contrast to Panagariya, who argued for closer economic ties between India and China by delinking the political aspect. Much of the agreements reached during the fourth summit have not been taken up by either of the two governments,” said a senior NITI Aayog official.

A sub-group on infrastructure in the fourth summit had arrived at agreements for closer cooperation on semi-high speed railways, redevelopment of railway stations and a railway university. “None of these is on the government’s priority. The Ministry of Railways is taking the help of Japan in setting up a training institute on high-speed railways in Gandhinagar. The roadmap outlined by the fourth summit has lost direction in the absence of political commitment,” added the official.

Outgoing NITI Aayog vice-chairman Arvind Panagariya wanted to replicate the Chinese model of provincial economic zones in the form of coastal economic zones in India, besides promoting closer ties between Indian states and Chinese provinces. “Panagariya believed that Chinese surplus capital could have quickened economic activities in India. But larger views against him by the likes of Swadeshi Jagran Manch’s (SJM) Ashwani Mahajan stated that Chinese capital wasn’t for India’s benefit, but for capturing the market only,” said a NITI Aayog official, who added that Panagariya’s successor (Rajiv Kumar) is closer in his outlook to SJM.

Stay up to date on all the latest The Sunday Standard news with The New Indian Express App. Download now
(Get the news that matters from New Indian Express on WhatsApp. Click this link and hit 'Click to Subscribe'. Follow the instructions after that.)


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp