Wigneswaran’s view on basic structure of  Lanka constitution runs counter to that of panel

The sub-committee on Center-Periphery relations was chaired by D. Siddharthan, a Tamil National Alliance (TNA) MP.

Published: 22nd November 2016 10:49 PM  |   Last Updated: 22nd November 2016 10:49 PM   |  A+A-



Express News Service

COLOMBO:  The view of C.V.Wigneswaran, Chief Minister of Sri Lanka’s Tamil-majority Northern Province, on the basic structure of the proposed Sri Lankan constitution, runs counter to that of the Constitutional Assembly’s sub-committee on Center-Provincial relations.

While the sub-committee has refrained from branding the proposed devolution system as either “federal” or “unitary”, Wigneswaran said here on Tuesday, that the constitution should not only be federal in nature but should identify itself as such.

“Proper devolution to the provinces and naming the constitution as ‘federal’ is important. A patchwork of different ideas will not do if the current problems are to be resolved,” Wigneswaran said while initiating a North-South dialogue organized by the Tamil Peoples’ Council (TPC), which he heads.

But this is likely to lead to the division of the Sri Lankan Tamil polity into “moderates”, who are inclined to go half way to meet the concerns of the majority Sinhalese for the sake of reaching an amicable  solution of the national question, and “radicals”, who want the full realization of the Tamils’ aspirations, not through half-way houses, but here and now.

The sub-committee on Center-Periphery relations was chaired by D. Siddharthan, a Tamil National Alliance (TNA) MP. The TNA has 16 Members in parliament. It is also the ruling party in the Northern Provincial Council.  But Northern Province Chief Minister Wigneswaran, though elected as TNA, is not fully with it. In fact, he has his own group called the Tamil Peoples’ Council (TPC) which has brought together Tamil radicals from various parties and walks of life.

A federal structure has been the traditional and main demand of the Tamils from 1948. But given the staunch opposition to the idea from the majority Sinhalese over the years, the Constitutional Assembly’s sub-committee on Center-Provincial  relations avoided using the term “federal” or “unitary” through it recommended substantial devolution of power over land, police and finances to the provinces. It also recommended that the provincial Governor should be a figurehead and not the de-facto and de jure Chief Executive as he is now.


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp