WTO says US failed to fully comply in Boeing subsidies dispute

The WTO ruled in March 2012 that billions of dollars of subsidies to Boeing were illegal and notified the United States to bring them to an end.

Published: 10th June 2017 12:17 AM  |   Last Updated: 10th June 2017 12:17 AM   |  A+A-

WTO, Trump

(File Photo | Reuters)


GENEVA: The World Trade Organization said Friday the United States had not fully complied with a 2012 ruling ordering it to halt subsidies to Boeing, in a partial victory for rival aircraft maker Airbus and the EU.

The ruling from a WTO panel was the latest blow in the decade-long clash between the titans of the civil aircraft industry, which has seen both Airbus and Boeing score points along the way.

The WTO ruled in March 2012 that billions of dollars of subsidies to Boeing were illegal and notified the United States to bring them to an end.

But just a few months later, the European Union filed a new complaint with the global trade body, alledging that Washington was not complying with that order. 

In the ruling published Friday, WTO said it had concluded that the state of Washington had continued to dish out subsidies totalling $325 million in the form of tax cuts to Boeing between 2013 and 2015.

It agreed with Brussels that the United States had not taken "appropriate steps to remove the adverse effects or ... withdraw the subsidy."

The EU hailed the ruling, saying in a statement that it confirmed "that the United States has taken no appropriate action to comply with its obligation to withdraw subsidies declared illegal ... or to remove their adverse effects."

"The panel agrees that the US has simply ignored existing WTO rulings and has continued to subsidise Boeing," EU Trade Commissioner Cecilia Malmstrom said in the statement.

Plans to appeal

But the WTO ruling also rejected significant portions of the EU complaint, finding that Brussels had failed to demonstrate that US subsidies after 2012 to Boeing's research and development programmes were harming EU interests through lost sales and price cuts.

Washington therefore chose to see the ruling as a victory, pointing out that the WTO panel had found that 28 of the 29 programmes it examined were in compliance.

"The panel found only one state-level programme ... to be contrary to WTO rules," the US government said in a statement.

"The United States disagrees and plans to appeal this limited finding," it added.

The EU has also been reprimanded by the WTO during the tit-for-tat conflict between Airbus and Boeing. 

In September, a WTO panel found that Brussels had not respected a 2011 ruling ordering it to take steps to withdraw several support and subsidy programmes for Airbus.

The WTO did not put a value on those programmes but Boeing said they amounted to $22 billion worth of illegal support for Airbus development and sales.

The EU has appealed against that decision, insisting that the subsidies in question had been discontinued.

US Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer meanwhile insisted that Friday's ruling proved that "the United States does not provide subsidies even remotely comparable to the uniquely large and uniquely harmful EU subsidies to Airbus."

The WTO, which aims to create a level playing field in global trade, does not have the ability to force compliance with its rulings, but can approve retaliatory measures which in theory can pressure trade manipulators to fall into line. 

Stay up to date on all the latest World news with The New Indian Express App. Download now


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp