The Prime Minister as Gentleman

My Lord,  Never let me climb so high that I’m unable to embrace a stranger.
The humanism in Atal Bihari Vajpayee made him taller than a prime minister.

Published: 19th August 2018 04:00 AM  |   Last Updated: 19th August 2018 08:01 AM   |  A+A-

Former Indian Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee. (File)

My Lord,  Never let me climb so high that I’m unable to embrace a stranger.
The humanism in Atal Bihari Vajpayee made him taller than a prime minister. In the vastness of his mind the ephemerality of political glory counted for what it was. He once said: You might become an ex-prime minister one day, but you will never become an ex-poet. He was a universalist, his literate self dwelling above his political persona.

Vajpayee was reared in the RSS school, attending officers’ training courses from 1940 and qualifying as a full-time pracharak the year India became independent. But he was seldom seen as an activist pracharak preaching the prescribed gospel. He looked more like a dreamer, reaching out to people in ways that went beyond his training. Although he is on record as saying “The Sangh is my soul”, sensibilities of a larger mission seemed to be working within him. Above the pracharak and the politician was the poet. His spirit roamed free.

This drew wider attention as Vajpayee entered Parliament. It is part of legend that the young MP’s flowing oratory turned Jawaharlal Nehru into an admirer. The oft-repeated story is that Nehru would rush to the House when Vajpayee rose to speak, and that he once told the BJP leader: One day you will be prime minister. Nehru sent him to the UN General Assembly one year to help him get international exposure and some useful training in diplomacy.

Such non-partisan functioning in the larger interests of the country is difficult to imagine nowadays. Nehru’s very name has become taboo in patriotic circles and young leaders of Opposition parties are ridiculed as childish. One reason Vajpayee rose to greatness was that he lived in an age that valued political courtesies and did not allow petty-mindedness to cast shadows upon it. That age is behind us. What the poet in Vajpayee described as “darkness in the middle of the day” has come.

It started sending early signals in the middle of Vajpayee’s term in office. His stature had grown as he progressed from frustrated short terms to a full term as prime minister beginning 1998. The Pokhran atomic explosion that year and the Kargil War the following year put garlands of glamour round his neck. He asserted his personal supremacy over his party hardliners when he took a bus to Lahore in 1999. His initiatives for peace provoked a Vishwa Hindu Parishad secretary to call him a “pseudo Hindu”.

The ultra Hindus got their chance to punish him in 2002. When Gujarat exploded into communal violence that year, Prime Minister Vajpayee was outraged. Within a month of the atrocities he visited the state and said at a press conference that the king’s duty to uphold rajdharma had not been carried out. He decided to seek the resignation of the state’s chief minister when the national executive of the BJP met in Goa a few days later. The flight to Goa turned out to be one of the most historic in India’s aviation history. L K Advani and Arun Jaitley strongly opposed any action against the Gujarat chief minister. Vajpayee was further rattled when slogans were raised at the meeting in favour of the chief minister. Vajpayee had to forget his concept of rajdharma and watch his critics celebrating their triumph.

The post-Goa Vajpayee was a politically enfeebled Vajpayee. Advani now became Deputy Prime Minister. RSS demanded a meeting with the Prime Minister and got it, establishing the restoration of its political influence, which Vajpayee had kept at near-zero level all along.

It is now 14 years since Vajpayee retired as prime minister. It can be seen that Vajpayee’s India was different from today’s India. Vajpayee’s BJP was different from today’s BJP. Democracy itself was different, allowing space for opponents of the government, dissent playing its essential role in public life, the spirit of freedom never suppressed overtly or covertly.

For these extraneous reasons as well as for the vibrancy of his mind, Vajpayee’s place in history will be above that of all others in his party. He represented the ethos of the nation—spiritualism without zealotry, tolerance, liberalism. Such was the roundedness of Vajpayee’s make-up that we could stand up and say to all the world: This was a gentleman. And sing with him: It’s dark in the middle of the day / The sun is defeated by its shadow / Squeeze the oil from your soul and feed the wick / Come let’s light the lamp again.

Stay up to date on all the latest T J S George news with The New Indian Express App. Download now
(Get the news that matters from New Indian Express on WhatsApp. Click this link and hit 'Click to Subscribe'. Follow the instructions after that.)


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

  • Atya

    Vajpayee enjoyed hard ground work and grey matter work of crores of RSS VHP workers across india..can he disown the sacrifice and empathise minorities who never voted for him to reach PM s post
    8 months ago reply
    • stam

      So a PM should work only for those who voted for him? What a primitive, uncharitable, and inhuman idea! By the way how can a voter be made to vote for a leader of a party that has guttural hatred for that voter? would you?
      8 months ago reply

    Some misleading words were not needed, or is it an agenda?
    8 months ago reply
  • Chandrasekaran

    Well scripted analysis. Vajpai stood unique as he unequivocally condemned Godra much to the displeasure of RSS, which had lent crutches to Modi. The huge gap was visible when a senior custodian lamented for rajadharma, contrasting to the present custodian whose sadness expressed was shocking, as the latter likened the Godra victims to the puppies crushed under wheels.The column has exposed the writ of the organisation which had killed mahatma as supreme and non- dismissable, and pulls the strings of the government , who ever may be in the chair.
    8 months ago reply
    • mohan

      Vajpayee was giving a lip service when he talked about raj dharma! if he had felt Modi was wrong, he could have easily replaced him as modi was just few months old in CM post and he wasn't a powerful personality in the party then. The fact that he was retained shows either they believed he was not responsible or they ware sanguine about it
      8 months ago reply

      The article tries to mislead under the cover of praising the former PM.
      8 months ago reply
      • stam

        So truth is 'misleading'?
        8 months ago reply
        • Bapuji

          Let Vajpayee's BJP return in national interest and unity of the country that has lived harmoniously for 72 years in Independent India.
          7 months ago reply
flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp