Perils of imperialism

Shashi Tharoor meticulously highlights the various facets of the British empire that looted India for over 200 years before leaving behind a nation brutally torn apart by Partition.

Published: 03rd December 2016 02:10 PM  |   Last Updated: 03rd December 2016 03:36 PM   |  A+A-



Express News Service

I came to this book a sceptic, its very title indicating a stance rather than objective analysis. Indian by birth but British in nationality, I was not sure I wanted such a polarised view as, for a number of years now, I’ve felt loyalties shifting towards my adopted land—for the freedom I enjoy there as a woman and in sorrowful recognition of the fact that, all said and done, it is Britain that has given me my best opportunities. However, Shashi Tharoor’s writing—brisk and persuasive—had me rapt and has rendered me a convert.

Yes, I knew that, the British came essentially to trade before seeing how easy it was to divide and rule for their own benefit. I also knew that those imperialists had shown scant interest in the welfare of their subjects, taking what they wanted for over 200 years before cutting and running, leaving behind a nation brutally torn apart by Partition. But it took this book to make me realise how many aspects of colonialism I did not know, or had not seriously considered. Buying too easily into the facile argument that India was a loosely knit gathering of often warring principalities until the British came along, I had not taken into account that most native rulers were not as dissolute as the convenient British narrative made them out to be, ruling over their people with a great deal more compassion than the Empire did. Tharoor cites the examples of Travancore and Baroda royals.

Read: Many Brits are unaware of the atrocities committed: Shashi Tharoor

Tharoor also invites his reader to think of what might have happened to the Mughals and the Marathas, had the British allowed them to be. In that long and heart-tugging list of what-may-have-beens, perhaps the most affecting thought for me was what Nehru described as ‘injuries to self-esteem’ while Tharoor, quoting Pankaj Mishra, also reminds us that the ‘European subordination of Asia was not just economic, political and military but also intellectual, moral and spiritual’. Tharoor meticulously and systematically picks apart every single argument presented by Raj apologists such as Niall Ferguson, Andrew Roberts and Lawrence James who trot out that old tired list of things Indians should forever remain grateful to the British for: democracy, the rule of law, the English language, railways, tea and cricket. Attempting to sum up Tharoor’s incontestable and nuanced arguments while constrained by a tight word-count would be disrespectful and so I can only exhort everyone to buy this book and explore its brilliance for themselves.


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp