Ayodhya verdict: Senior advocate KV Dhananjay on the big question Muslims could ask

The judgment "will receive wide acceptance from the mainstream Hindu community. However, it also raises several questions and may not be the last word on this dispute," he said.

Published: 09th November 2019 03:52 PM  |   Last Updated: 09th November 2019 03:52 PM   |  A+A-

Nirvani Akhara chief Mahant Dharam Das along with Maulana Suhaib Qasmi, President, Ayodhya Varti Committee and others after the Ram janmbhumi- Babri masjid case hearing at Supreme court in New Delhi on Wednesday. | (Arun Kumar P | EPS)

Nirvani Akhara chief Mahant Dharam Das along with Maulana Suhaib Qasmi, President, Ayodhya Varti Committee and others after the Ram janmbhumi- Babri masjid case hearing at Supreme court in New Delhi on Wednesday. | (Arun Kumar P | EPS)

By Express News Service

After 69 years, the Ayodhya dispute finally saw the Supreme Court deliver a judgment. 

In a 1045-page verdict, a five-member Constitution bench comprising Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi, Chief Justice designate SA Bobde, Justices DY Chandrachud, Ashok Bhushan and SA Nazeer, unanimously held that "The Allahabad High Court was wrong in dividing the disputed site into three parts (in 2010)."

The bench went on to observe that by exercising its powers under Article 142 of the Constitution, the Supreme Court must ensure that a wrong committed is remedied and directed the Centre to form an Ayodhya trust for building of the temple while announcing five acres of alternate land at a prominent spot in the temple town for Muslims.

Senior Supreme Court Advocate KV Dhananjay said the judgment "will receive wide acceptance from the mainstream Hindu community. However, it also raises several questions and may not be the last word on this dispute."

Also Read - In a nutshell: What the five-judge bench said in the landmark Ayodhya judgment

He said that of the three sides who were party to the dispute, the judgment by the Supreme Court "keeps out two sides - the Muslims and the Nirmohi Akhara - and has allocated the disputed site exclusively to one side only, the idol/diety side faction of the Hindus". 

This was a surprise as "to begin with, the Nirmohi Akhara was the one that fiercely fought the Muslims and took control of the outer courtyard of the Mosque in the 18th century. Historical records from 1776 point to such control of the outer courtyard by the Nirmohi Akhara, martial sect of the Hindus. They have been associated with the disputed site since then." 

The judgment depriving the Akhara "of the entire disputed land may surprise many".

Also Read - We want legal rights not five acres of land: Asaduddin Owaisi on Ayodhya verdict

Dhananjay also said a question could be raised on why the Supreme Court after recognising the rights of Muslims to get relief preferred to allot them land elsewhere and not at the disputed site itself.

"Yes, the judgment does ask the Government to allocate five acres of land to the Muslim side to build a Mosque. Though the Supreme Court undoubtedly has such powers under Article 142 of the Constitution, the question still remains why it would – after recognising that the Muslims too deserve relief in this case - not allocate any land to them in the disputed site itself, but confer land outside it instead. More such questions are likely moving forward," he stressed.

Hear the full interview here:

Stay up to date on all the latest Nation news with The New Indian Express App. Download now
(Get the news that matters from New Indian Express on WhatsApp. Click this link and hit 'Click to Subscribe'. Follow the instructions after that.)

Comments

Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp