STOCK MARKET BSE NSE

Bombay HC dismisses woman's plea alleging harassment by Shiv Sena MP Sanjay Raut

An 'A-summary' report is one where the police seek to close a probe in a case, where they find that although an offence is made out, there isn't enough evidence against the accused persons.

Published: 25th August 2021 01:45 PM  |   Last Updated: 25th August 2021 01:45 PM   |  A+A-

Shiv Sena leader Sanjay Raut

Shiv Sena leader Sanjay Raut

By PTI

MUMBAI: The Bombay High Court on Wednesday dismissed a 39-year-old woman's plea alleging that she was harassed and stalked by some people at the behest of Shiv Sena MP Sanjay Raut and her husband.

The petitioner, who is a resident of the city, had urged the High Court to direct the police to investigate three complaints lodged by her in 2013 and 2018 against unknown persons, and initiate action against the deputy police commissioner (DCP) of Zone VIII in the city.

A division bench of Justice S S Shinde and Justice N J Jamadar had reserved its verdict on her plea on July 22.

​ALSO READ | No partition if Godse had killed Jinnah: Shiv Sena MP Sanjay Raut

The bench on Wednesday directed the petitioner to "follow the process of law and approach the appropriate subordinate court" to raise her grievances pertaining to the 'A-summary' report filed by the police in two cases and a chargesheet in the third complaint.

An 'A-summary' report is one where the police seek to close a probe in a case, where they find that although an offence is made out, there isn't enough evidence against the accused persons.

The woman, through her counsel, Abha Singh, had told the court that the DCP of Zone VIII, where she had lodged her complaint, had failed to follow the directions of the National Commission for Women while registering such complaint.

​ALSO READ | BJP's 'Jan Ashirwad Yatra' invitation for third wave of COVID-19: Sanjay Raut

The petitioner had told the court that the people who "stalked and harassed" her had done so in connivance with Raut.

On June 22, the High Court had directed the Mumbai police commissioner to look into the grievances raised by the woman and submit a report on the matter.

Chief public prosecutor Aruna Pai had submitted on behalf of the police that a chargesheet had been filed in one of the complaints, and A-summary reports had been filed in the other two matters.

Hence, further investigation was not required.

Pai further argued that the woman's pleas in the High Court were not maintainable.

A detailed order of the High Court in the matter is awaited.



Comments

Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp