Soft voice, big stick: India must remember Teddy Roosevelt while dealing with China

Political niceties apart, China would like to see India as a weaker power and will, characteristically, try to bully its way through the whole situation.

Published: 17th June 2020 12:42 AM  |   Last Updated: 17th June 2020 12:25 PM   |  A+A-

Soldiers stand guard as vehicles pass through Zojila Pass on their way to frontier region of Ladakh (File Photo | PTI)

While the facts regarding the developments in Ladakh are not yet fully known, media reports indicate that matters are serious and a cause of concern. Border engagements of this kind do not happen spontaneously, particularly when the Chinese build-up had reportedly begun some months ago.

Military engagement on a sensitive border cannot take place without orders from above. The situation will either escalate or both sides will talk it out, with India aiming to revert to the status quo ante, although sanguine official comments about the extent and areas of disengagement created doubts.

China respects strength and India will have to demonstrate that it has the strength. The process is likely to be long drawn out. The fact that China has a definite intention and proactive strategy is clear.

Political niceties apart, China would like to see India as a weaker power and will, characteristically, try to bully its way through the whole situation.

China’s actions need to be viewed not just in the context of the ground situation in Ladakh or along the entire border but within China’s global strategy of establishing itself as a global superpower and regional hegemon.

India must have the capabilities in terms of infrastructure, equipment, training and supplies to sustain its position in the long term. “Speak softly and carry a big stick” was a policy advocated in 1900 by a former US President Theodore Roosevelt (apparently quoting a West African proverb).

India should not make the mistake of turning this advice on its head by speaking too loudly and not carrying a big enough stick. The work required to develop sound infrastructure in Ladakh for our armed forces and local communities needs to be done in a quiet, consistent manner without the hoop-la of publicised events.

And the government’s communication strategy will need to be delicately balanced, while taking the public into confidence on the actual ground situation. There should be no mixed signals or multiple voices.

(The writer is a former Deputy National Security Adviser and Ambassador)


RIP Colonel Santosh Babu: My son was too young to die, says father; mother heartbroken, but proud 

Ladakh martyr Havildar Palani served country for 22 years, had plans to retire next year

Sepoy KK Ojha's daughter was born just 17 days ago, never got to see her

More from Opinions.


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

  • zaheer ahmed

    There must be peace in the region. Actually the RSS and Hindutiwa is spoiling the fabric of our society. The long stick is not the actual but the harmony
    3 months ago reply
  • Jermin

    It is amazing how this know it all journalists just because they have space to write become experts in everything and start advising everyone from the chief of staff
    3 months ago reply
flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp