Indian Union Muslim League in a spot after MP Kunhalikutty skips triple talaq voting session

In a statement from Abu Dhabi, P K Kunhalikutty MP said he could not attend Parliament on Thursday as he was travelling abroad.

Published: 29th December 2018 02:02 AM  |   Last Updated: 29th December 2018 05:53 AM   |  A+A-

IUML Leader PK Kunhalikutty (Express Photo | A Sanesh)

By Express News Service

KOZHIKODE: The Indian Union Muslim League (IUML) is in a firefighting mode. The reason: brewing resentment over the absence of IUML national general secretary P K Kunhalikutty during the crucial voting in Parliament on a revised bill that makes Triple Talaq or instant divorce among Muslims a punishable offence. 

Kunhalikutty’s decision to skip Parliament on Thursday to attend the wedding of an industrialist not only put the party in a spot, but also led to speculation of a lack of coordination between him and the only other party MP E T Mohammad Basheer. 

READ: Triple Talaq Bill discussion HIGHLIGHTS

Though the initial decision of the party’s national leadership was to boycott the voting, Basheer went ahead and voted against the bill, surprising many within the party. Deputy Leader of the Opposition in the state and IUML leader M K Muneer was left to firefight on the issue while addressing a press conference here on Friday. 

Contending that the IUML was a ‘small party’ with just two MPs, Muneer argued that the presence of Kunhalikutty would not have made much of a difference as both MPs would not have got a chance to speak on the matter. 

Besides, Basheer had successfully driven home the party’s opposition towards criminalising Triple Talaq in Parliament, he added. 

READ: 'IUML should demand P K Kunhalikutty’s resignation for absence at triple talaq bill discussion'

“The party’s central leadership had initially taken a decision to boycott the voting. However, if it was later decided on the floor of the House to vote against the bill, then it is a judicious decision as doing so is also a form of expressing dissent,” Muneer said when asked about the deviation in stance. Asked why such a tall leader like Kunhalikutty chose to be absent on such a crucial voting day, Muneer said it is for Kunhalikutty himself to clarify.

Flays Women’s Wall 

Muneer repeated his earlier stance that the proposed Women’s Wall on January 1 is a communal wall which will only serve to polarise society. 

“Women are being used as a tool for the Women’s Wall. Even though the organisers claim the wall is to uphold women’s equality, it will only amount to declaring women as slaves who are bound to obey the diktats of men,” Muneer said.

He said various government departments were threatening women employees that their lives would be made miserable if they do not cooperate with the Women’s Wall. He cited an instance of a Kudumbashree officer in Malappuram threatening women members about serious consequences if they do not become part of the Women’s Wall.

Voting decision taken jointly: Kunhalikutty

In a statement from Abu Dhabi, P K Kunhalikutty MP said he could not attend Parliament on Thursday as he was travelling abroad. The decision to vote against the Triple Talaq Bill was taken after consultation between him and the other MP of the party E T Mohammad Basheer.

“While some Opposition parties such as the Congress wanted to boycott the voting after discussion, other parties suddenly decided to participate in the voting. Basheer and I jointly decided that it was better to vote against the Bill to record the party’s protest,” he said. He said propaganda against him by vested interests on the matter was not factually true.

Stay up to date on all the latest Kerala news with The New Indian Express App. Download now
(Get the news that matters from New Indian Express on WhatsApp. Click this link and hit 'Click to Subscribe'. Follow the instructions after that.)


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp