Archaeological evidence after faith based arguments on Ayodhya

Five students were electrocuted to death in a freak mishap on the terrace of a residential school building in Karnataka's Koppal.

Published: 18th August 2019 04:18 PM  |   Last Updated: 18th August 2019 05:49 PM   |  A+A-

Ayodhya, Ram mandir, Babri Masjid

Carved stones are seen at the Ram Janmabhomi Nyas-run workshop at Karsevakpuram in Ayodhya. (File Photo | PTI)


NEW DELHI: Last week, the Hindu parties argued in the Supreme Court on the credibility of the excavations by the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) that have shown a massive public structure mainly used for worship existed at the disputed site in Ayodhya.

Initially the senior counsels representing the Ram Lalla Virajman, the deity, had contextualized the relevance of Hindu faith attached to the birthplace of Lord Ram at Ayodhya, and insisted that faith can be treated as credible evidence.

During last week, the counsels cited an ASI report which they referred to as "scientific evidence", to substantiate that a large number of cultural artefacts signifying different periods in history connected with the Hindu faith were found at the site where the Babri Masjid existed until it was razed in December 1992.

Although senior counsel C.S. Vaidyanathan, appearing for Ram Lalla Virajman, informed the court that there was nothing specific to show that the underground construction over which the Babri Masjid was built was a temple dedicated to Lord Ram.

ALSO READ: Temple stone carving in Uttar Pradesh's Ayodhya speeds up

But the assiduous Hindu faith and people's belief established that it was a temple dedicated to Lord Ram, they said.

The Constitution bench hearing the Ayodhya dispute had queried Vaidyanathan to prove the claim that a mosque was built on the ruins of the temple.

He told the court that archaeological evidence of a massive public structure indicated that people worshipped at the site and the images on the pillars further established that Hindus worshipped these images.

He cited the image of 'sheshnag' or snake god worshipped by Hindus.

This public structure, which probably dated back to 2nd century BC, was nearly 50x30 meters in dimension with many massive pillars, and the floor of the temple supported the pillars on square base.

No Muslim artefacts were found in the excavations, submitted the counsel.

During the excavations, a medieval 'nalla' usually used to drain out excess water or any other liquid was also discovered and it had a structure having a spout.

ALSO READ: Ayodhya hearing - Temple existed before Babri Masjid came up at disputed site, counsel for deity to SC

The counsel indicated towards the possibility of performing "abhishek" to god. This structure was circular and pointed towards the faith of the people.

According to the ASI report cited by the senior counsel, at the site of the Ram JanmaBhoomi, a massive wall of bricks was observed, which was identified as a fortification wall.

The counsel said that excavation material in the form of pottery, terracotta and other objects of the previous periods, particularly of Period I (Northern Black Polished Ware or NBPW level) and Period III (Kushan level) were found at the site.

The early medieval levels included the kushan and shunga levels, which date back to 3rd and 4th century BC. The NBPW probably went back to about 700 years before Christ.

Vaidyanathan produced before the court photographs of sculptures and images, found in the Babri Masjid structure -- before it was demolished by kar sevaks -- and argued that the place held divine sanctity for the Hindus.

He also cited images on the pillars showing a Garuda flanked by lions.

The ASI report of August 2003 was the fifth report on the historical topography of Ayodhya, a temple town in Faizabad district in Uttar Pradesh.

A.E. Cunningham, a British surveyor, conducted the first survey in Ayodhya in 1862-63 followed by another in 1889-91 by A. Fuhrer.

ALSO READ Will Ayodhya judgement come before CJI Gogoi's retirement in November?

Professor A.K. Narain organised the third excavation in Ayodhya in 1969-70. Finally, Professor B.B. Lal conducted a more critical study of the area in 1975-76.

Vaidyanathan produced nearly 100 photographs of objects, which include several cultural artefacts, excavated from the disputed area to establish that the place was revered by Hindus for its divinity for many thousands of years.

He informed the court on the interpretation of these objects by archaeologists.

"The finding of the ASI report was based on the interpretation of excavated materials, which was recovered from the site, by archaeologists specializing in this field. Such interpretation should have been normally be accepted by the court," he said when queried that any human or animal figurines do not necessarily represents divinity.

He said that such imagery was not central to Islam, and do not find place on any structure inside the mosque.

The arguments will continue next week.

Stay up to date on all the latest Nation news with The New Indian Express App. Download now
(Get the news that matters from New Indian Express on WhatsApp. Click this link and hit 'Click to Subscribe'. Follow the instructions after that.)


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp