'No grounds to review 2017 verdict': SC rejects Nirbhaya convict's plea against death sentence

The apex court bench made it clear that there was no error in the judgement of the trial court, Delhi High Court and the apex court convicting the accused and awarding death sentence.

Published: 18th December 2019 11:25 AM  |   Last Updated: 18th December 2019 06:01 PM   |  A+A-

A view of Supreme Court . (File | EPS)

A view of Supreme Court . (File | EPS)

By Express News Service

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Wednesday dismissed the review petition challenging the death penalty given to Akshay Kumar, one of the convicts in the 2012 Nirbhaya rape case.

A three-judge bench headed by Justice R Banumathi dismissed the petition and said, “The petitioner has again sought to assail the facts and findings, which cannot be permitted. Grounds raised were the same raised in previous appeals and review petitions.”

ALSO READ| Delay in hanging of convicts in Nirbhaya case 'painful': NCW chief Rekha Sharma

"Arguments raised have been made previously in the Supreme Court and had also been looked at during consideration of aggravating and mitigating circumstances," the bench said. The bench made it clear that there was no error in the judgement of the trial court, Delhi High Court and the apex court convicting the accused and awarding death sentence.

Advocate AP Singh appearing for Akshay asked for three weeks to be able to file his mercy petition before the President of India. Opposing the request, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta said the time prescribed for this is one week. But the bench said he can avail the time provided in the law to file his mercy petition.

ALSO READ| DCW chief Swati Maliwal welcomes SC decision to dismiss convict's review plea in Nirbhaya case

Earlier during the hearing, Singh alleged that the sole eyewitness in the case was bribed, adding that the death of Ram Singh in Tihar was very suspicious and his client was given death penalty as he was poor. "The air quality and water quality in Delhi/NCR is toxic and poisonous. The life span of any average person is going from short to shorter. Why execute the death penalty on anybody in a situation like this?" Singh told the court.

"The dying declaration of Nirbhaya is doubtful and cannot be relied upon. All six persons in the bus could not have raped her in just 21 minutes. She didn’t even name any of the accused in her dying declaration or mention the iron rod used by the accused," Singh said while citing a book penned down by a retired Tihar official during the arguments.

Urging the bench to dismiss the petition, Mehta told the court, "Gods will hang their heads in shame for not being able to save Nirbhaya and creating these monsters who raped her. They should be allowed no mercy." During the hearing, Nirbhaya’s parents were also present in court.

ALSO READ| 'Very happy with the verdict': Nirbhaya's mother welcomes SC decision on convict's death sentence

A special fast-track court in Delhi, in September 2013, had ordered capital punishment for the four convicts saying the case fit the rarest of rare category. The sentence was upheld by the Delhi high court in 2014.

On December 16, 2012, a 23-year-old woman, who later came to be known as Nirbhaya, was brutally assaulted and raped by six persons in a moving bus in south Delhi, an incident which prompted nationwide protests. She died from her injuries on 29 December at Mount Elizabeth Hospital in Singapore.

One of the other accused, who was a juvenile at the time of the incident, has been sent to a reform centre for three years while another, Ram Singh, was found dead in his cell in Tihar Jail in March 2013.


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

  • Apoorva

    Really guys
    3 years ago reply
flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp