Search Results

During a video call, the fraudsters allegedly accused him of involvement in money laundering and terror-funding cases.

He then approached the Malkajgiri Cybercrime police, who registered a case.

The accused allegedly kept the victim under digital surveillance from July 8 to August 3.

Threatening her with arrest and prosecution, the fraudsters allegedly forced the woman to remain connected to them through WhatsApp calls for nearly 12 days.

Fraudsters cited details about the family, including the grandson’s US stay and daughter’s commute, and threatened to frame the grandson in a drug case.

Justice Kant referred to the apex court's verdict holding that grounds for arrest must be provided to the accused in writing, rather than merely read aloud.