Kamra's statement comes a day after Attorney General K K Venugopal consented to the initiation of criminal contempt proceedings against him for a series of tweets.
In a tweet following the release of anchor Arnab Goswami, Kamra wrote 'DY Chandrachud is a flight attendant serving champagne to first-class passengers...'
Lawyer urges AG to reconsider decision declining consent to initiate contempt against Andhra CM Jagan
Taking the consent of the law officer is a condition precedent for initiating criminal contempt against a person.
In his letter to the CJI, Jagan had also claimed Justice Ramana was acting on behalf of Andhra Pradesh opposition leader Chandrababu Naidu.
The plea accuses the former CM of committing "willful non-compliance" of the court's May 3, 2019 order which had asked him to pay market rent of the bungalow occupied by him as ex-CM within six months
Goa CM Pramod Sawant on Tuesday said his government has filed a contempt petition in SC against Karnataka for allegedly diverting the Mahadayi river water.
Bhushan, who has to appear either personally or through video conferencing on October 23, has to respond to the Council within 15-days of receiving the notice.
Vice-chancellor Dr K C Sunny presided over the event.
He filed the petition for review of the August 14 judgement holding him guilty for the contempt of court contending that it 'suffers from multiple errors.'
Noted advocate Prashant Bhushan was held guilty of contempt on August 14 and asked to pay a token Rs 1 fine.
According to Section 24A of the Act, an advocate can be disqualified while Section 35 pertains to punishment for misconduct.
He called the contempt of court jurisdiction "very dangerous" and said it should be abolished.
A three-judge bench headed by Justice Arun Mishra while reading out the verdict said, court's decisions can’t be influenced by publications or opinions in the media.
Pay Re 1 as fine by September 15 or face jail, bar on practising: SC announces token punishment for Prashant Bhushan
The court also said that the press conference by four apex court Judges in January 2018 was wrong and said, 'Judges are not supposed to hold press conference.'
A bench comprising justices UU Lalit and Ashok Bhushan reserved its order after hearing arguments in the case.