Former DCW chairperson and Rajya Sabha member Swati Maliwal at the Parliament premises in New Delhi. (FILE | ANI)
Delhi

Booked for naming rape victim in 2016 case, Delhi court acquits Swati Maliwal

Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Neha Mittal also acquitted Bhupender Singh, then DCW’s Public Relations Officer, saying the prosecution had failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt.

Express News Service

NEW DELHI: A Delhi court on Thursday acquitted MP and former Delhi Commission for Women (DCW) chairperson Swati Maliwal in a case alleging that she disclosed the identity of a 14-year-old rape victim who later died.

Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Neha Mittal also acquitted Bhupender Singh, then DCW’s Public Relations Officer, saying the prosecution had failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt.

Prosecutors alleged that Singh, at Maliwal’s behest, sent a copy of a notice issued by her to the Burari police station house officer (SHO) on a WhatsApp group, ‘DCW Media’, which was later aired by a TV channel. The FIR claimed the notice, in which Maliwal sought details of the rape investigation, was “intentionally circulated.”

“This court is of the considered opinion that the prosecution has failed to prove the commission of offence under Section 74 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, read with Rule 86 of the Juvenile Justice Rules, by the accused persons beyond a reasonable doubt,” the magistrate said. She noted that the sending of the notice on WhatsApp by Singh, or its sharing with a news channel, was not proved.

“Court holds the accused persons not guilty of the commission of said offence. Accused persons, namely Swati Maliwal Jaihind and Bhupender Singh, are hereby acquitted of the offence under Section 74, read with Rule 86 of the Juvenile Justice Act,” she added, citing “complete failure on the part of prosecution or complainant (Inspector Satyabir Singh) to prove the sending of WhatsApp messages by the accused no. 2 (Singh). Thus, admission made by him, in his statement, if any, cannot discharge the burden of proof placed upon the prosecution.”

On claims that a TV channel showed the notice on July 25, 2016, the court said no such notice appeared in the footage and the anchor did not reveal the victim’s name. “Thus, the allegations of the prosecution to this extent appear to be baseless and unfounded,” it said.

Natural Gas (Supply Regulation) Order issued; prioritises households and transport sectors

Parliament budget session LIVE | Kiren Rijiju hails Speaker Om Birla, slams Opposition over no-confidence motion

LIVE | Iran war: Netanyahu says 'not done yet' as Israel begins new wave of strikes on Tehran

Two killed as violence breaks out in Meghalaya's West Garo Hills over bar on non-tribals in district council polls

SC says 'only way' to ensure equal rights for all women is to bring in UCC across India

SCROLL FOR NEXT