Union Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad speaks in the Lok Sabha (File Photo | PTI) 
India

No need to determine creamy layer in SC/ST: Law Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad

Defending the Constitution (126th) Amendment Bill, he asserted that quota in legislatures for SCs and STs was required to build a new political leadership of the two communities.

From our online archive

NEW DELHI: Law Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad on Tuesday said the government is of the view that there is no need to determine creamy layer in Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes as these communities have been "extremely deprived" for years.

Responding to the debate on 'The Constitution (126th) Amendment Bill' in Lok Sabha, Prasad referred to the issue of quota in government jobs, saying "we are of the view that is no need for a creamy layer for the SC and ST (communities)".

"We have made this stand very clear even before the Supreme Court that they have been extremely deprived and face discrimination," Prasad said.

A few days ago, the government had urged the Supreme Court to reconsider its stand that socially, educationally and economically advanced creamy layer of Scheduled Castes/Scheduled Tribes (SC/ST) communities should be excluded from the benefits of reservation in government services.

Defending the Constitution (126th) Amendment Bill, he asserted that quota in legislatures for SCs and STs was required to build a new political leadership of the two communities.

The Bill, which seeks to extend the reservation for SC and ST communities in legislatures for 10 years, was passed by Lok Sabha on Tuesday.

Delhi steps up security with 6,000 cops, 220 CAPF companies ahead of CJP's 'Tiranga' march

SC declines urgent hearing on plea against Central Park closure ahead of CJP’s ‘Tiranga’ march

Rahul questions Centre over Rubio's proposed meeting with Indian officials in Mumbai

Congress, allies seeking Bangladesh-like regime change: Rajnath Singh on SIR protests

Pinarayi Vijayan moves Supreme Court challenging Kerala HC order to lodge FIR in alleged CMRL bribery case